On 27.09.2008 (02:16), Juergen Reuter wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eyolf_=D8strem_ wrote:
>
> Originally, I borrowed the term "Episem" from the OpusTeX implementation of
> Gregorian Chant. Just a couple of minutes ago, I did a small search on
> Google and have to agree that t
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eyolf_=D8strem_ wrote:
I'm working on the docs for ancient music,
Nice to hear!
3. The form "Episem" is used, both as a lilypond command and in the
documentation text. Since it's not really a medieval concept at all, but a
term invented by the Solesmes m
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:18:59 +0200
> Von: "Eyolf Østrem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: lilypond-devel
> Betreff: Re: Three questions for ancient.itely
> On 25.09.2008 (04:09), Graham Percival wrote:
> >
> > Remem
On 25.09.2008 (04:09), Graham Percival wrote:
>
> Remember that nobody is maintaining the code for ancient music.
> If you can supply a patch, great! If not, then don't hold your
> breath.
One can't remember sth one never knew. Now that I know, I'll start
breathing again.
e
--
Aliquid meliu
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:55:49 +0200
Eyolf __strem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. One of the "known issues" under flags states:
>
> The attachment of ancient flags to stems is slightly off due
> to a change in early 2.3.x.
>
> About time to fix that, is it...?
Remember that nobody is maint
2008/9/24 Eyolf Østrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, this looks good. Any chance of getting this incorporated in the core
> code -- also in such a way that the first \override line is not necessary?
Sure, I'll formulate a patch for review.
Just for the record, it was Han-Wen's suggestion in this t
On 24.09.2008 (21:51), Neil Puttock wrote:
> Hi Eyolf,
>
> 2008/9/24 Eyolf Østrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > 1. Is there a good reason why it takes the monstruous
> > \override Staff.Accidental #'glyph-name-alist =
> > #alteration-mensural-glyph-name-alist
> > to change the Accidental style of a
Hi Eyolf,
2008/9/24 Eyolf Østrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1. Is there a good reason why it takes the monstruous
> \override Staff.Accidental #'glyph-name-alist =
> #alteration-mensural-glyph-name-alist
> to change the Accidental style of a piece, in contrast to the
> simple syntax for time signatu
I'm working on the docs for ancient music, and I've come across a number of
things that relate not primarily to the documentation, but to the program
itself:
1. Is there a good reason why it takes the monstruous
\override Staff.Accidental #'glyph-name-alist =
#alteration-mensural-glyph-name-alist
