Re: Time signature markups

2014-11-01 Thread Dan Eble
On Oct 29, 2014, at 13:01 , Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote: On 26 Oct 2014, at 14:02, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: Dan Eble wrote Sunday, October 26, 2014 12:34 AM time-signature.cc http://time-signature.cc/ has a comment at the top saying, “This file should go; the

Re: Time signature markups

2014-11-01 Thread Hans Aberg
On 1 Nov 2014, at 13:53, Dan Eble d...@faithful.be wrote: On Oct 29, 2014, at 13:01 , Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote: On 26 Oct 2014, at 14:02, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: Dan Eble wrote Sunday, October 26, 2014 12:34 AM time-signature.cc

Re: Time signature markups

2014-10-29 Thread Hans Aberg
On 26 Oct 2014, at 14:02, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: Dan Eble wrote Sunday, October 26, 2014 12:34 AM time-signature.cc http://time-signature.cc/ has a comment at the top saying, “This file should go; the formatting can completely be done with markups.” Can anyone

Re: Time signature markups

2014-10-26 Thread Trevor Daniels
Dan Eble wrote Sunday, October 26, 2014 12:34 AM time-signature.cc http://time-signature.cc/ has a comment at the top saying, “This file should go; the formatting can completely be done with markups.” Can anyone point me to a good example of that, or is it a unique idea? Well, that

Time signature markups

2014-10-25 Thread Dan Eble
time-signature.cc http://time-signature.cc/ has a comment at the top saying, “This file should go; the formatting can completely be done with markups.” Can anyone point me to a good example of that, or is it a unique idea? Thanks, — Dan ___