I am writing a very-simplified LilyPond parser, just to analyze the notes,
chords and rests/silences within a particular { }-block of LY code. I want
to completely ignore all non-note (and non-chords and non-rest/silence)
elements.
I am trying to understand all of the (at least most common) possib
On 11/12/10 7:11 AM, "Jeff Epstein" wrote:
> I am writing a very-simplified LilyPond parser, just to analyze the notes,
> chords and rests/silences within a particular { }-block of LY code. I want
> to completely ignore all non-note (and non-chords and non-rest/silence)
> elements.
>
> I am tryi
Hi Carl,
very interesting information...
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:12:40 -0700
Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> An easier approach might be to write an engraver
Pardon my ignorance, but is this something like what articulate.ly[1]
does or are you referring to some deeper, possible c++ level? E.g.,
\sc
On 11/13/10 5:50 AM, "David Santamauro" wrote:
>
>
> Hi Carl,
>
> very interesting information...
>
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:12:40 -0700
> Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>>
>> An easier approach might be to write an engraver
>
> Pardon my ignorance, but is this something like what articulate.l
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:32:06 -0700
Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >>
> >> An easier approach might be to write an engraver
> >
> > Pardon my ignorance, but is this something like what
> > articulate.ly[1] does or are you referring to some deeper, possible
> > c++ level? E.g.,
> >
> > \score {
> > \
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:17 AM, David Santamauro
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:32:06 -0700 Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> The second state is in the form of scheme music expressions. The job
>> of the parser is to convert lilypond music expressions into scheme
>> music expressions. Most user-d
Am Samstag, 13. November 2010, um 13:50:24 schrieb David Santamauro:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:12:40 -0700
> Carl Sorensen wrote:
> > An easier approach might be to write an engraver
[...]
> Is there already a 'test' engraver that simply outputs to stdout as a
> simple prototype ... more-or-less a
On 11/13/10 9:17 AM, "David Santamauro" wrote:
>
> I want to offer to do it, but I have some intense studying to do. Is
> this the correct list to ask questions about this. I'm not in
> inexperienced developer, just a novice with the internals of
> lilypond. I just don't want to seem burdensome.
On 13/11/10 16:17, David Santamauro wrote:
> I want to offer to do it, but I have some intense studying to do. Is
> this the correct list to ask questions about this. I'm not in
> inexperienced developer, just a novice with the internals of
> lilypond. I just don't want to seem burdensome.
>
The ot
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:29:07 +
Wols Lists wrote:
> On 13/11/10 16:17, David Santamauro wrote:
> > I want to offer to do it, but I have some intense studying to do. Is
> > this the correct list to ask questions about this. I'm not in
> > inexperienced developer, just a novice with the interna
Hi,
2010/11/15 David Santamauro
>
> I can't seem to find that [frogs] list. I'm here:
> http://lilypond.org/contact.html
It is mentioned at the beginning of the contributor's guide, and quite
frequently in LilyPond Report. However, i argee that it could be in
some more visible place.
Here's the
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jan Warchoł
wrote:
> It is mentioned at the beginning of the contributor's guide, and quite
> frequently in LilyPond Report. However, i argee that it could be in
> some more visible place.
What, like http://lilypond.org/help-us.html ?
:-)
Cheers,
Valentin
On 11/15/10 2:32 AM, "David Santamauro" wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:29:07 +
> Wols Lists wrote:
>
>> On 13/11/10 16:17, David Santamauro wrote:
>>> I want to offer to do it, but I have some intense studying to do. Is
>>> this the correct list to ask questions about this. I'm no
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:29:37AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 11/15/10 2:32 AM, "David Santamauro" wrote:
>
> > I can't seem to find that list. I'm here:
> > http://lilypond.org/contact.html
>
> Well, it appears that we have a documentation problem.
>
> The list is fr...@lilynet.net.
>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> James: could you look into this, and make a suggestion for the
> docs or a patch? (if you propose a minor change, just write up a
> patch; if you propose a more significant change, it might be good
> to discuss it before you go to the bot
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:58:33AM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > James: could you look into this, and make a suggestion for the
> > docs or a patch? (if you propose a minor change, just write up a
> > patch; if you propose a more
16 matches
Mail list logo
