2015-05-07 16:25 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska :
> \repeat unfold 800 { c' d' e'8 d' c'4 }
>
> three times with averages of
>
> 2.16.2: ~21.5 sec.
> 2.19.15: ~ 16 sec.
> 2.19.17: ~ 14 sec.
> 2.19.20: ~ 12 sec.
>
> on Debian.
>
>
I did the same test on debian (sid), running the same version several times.
Wh
Urs Liska writes:
> However, there's one more thing to consider here, particularly with
> the recent experiences wrt .ly compilation failures, is if there's a
> significant difference between binary releases and custom builds. From
> the above only 2.19.20 is self-compiled. But a self-compiled mo
Am 07.05.2015 um 13:06 schrieb David Kastrup:
Phil Holmes writes:
I've just started working again on some mensural music with associated
modern transcription. The ancient score is about 8 pages long. With
2.18.2 one of the pieces takes 97 seconds to compile. With 2.19.19 it
takes 37 secon
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: Windows speed improvements - update
Phil Holmes writes:
I've just started working again on some mensural music with associated
modern tr
Phil Holmes writes:
> I've just started working again on some mensural music with associated
> modern transcription. The ancient score is about 8 pages long. With
> 2.18.2 one of the pieces takes 97 seconds to compile. With 2.19.19 it
> takes 37 seconds.
>
> Fantastic!
A bit too fantastic.
I've just started working again on some mensural music with associated
modern transcription. The ancient score is about 8 pages long. With
2.18.2 one of the pieces takes 97 seconds to compile. With 2.19.19 it
takes 37 seconds.
Fantastic!
___
lily
