On 2/19/11, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Also, could we dispense on esthetic changes on developer-only
> parts (like the regtest) ?
This was not an esthetic proposal. I honestly (but mistakenly!)
thought that the lack of complete bars made the spacing more fragile,
which made it harder to spot actu
On 2/19/11, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> The regtest also compares for memory and cpu use, but this test does
> not work very well.
>
> We should probably disable it by default.
The cpu regtest *is* disabled by default. We're considering a patch
to re-enable it:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/is
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc: ; "Han-Wen Nienhuys"
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: a present for Graham
2011/2/19 Graham Percival
Cheers,
- Graham
PS one kiss -- on the cheek, mind y
2011/2/19 Graham Percival
>
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 02:32:45PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> > PS Graham, i'm sorry if you felt offended by that kiss thing - i meant
> > it as a joke only, referring to what you said to Owen Tuz at frogs
> > list.
>
> No, I wasn't at all offended, and I agree tha
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 02:32:45PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> PS Graham, i'm sorry if you felt offended by that kiss thing - i meant
> it as a joke only, referring to what you said to Owen Tuz at frogs
> list:
No, I wasn't at all offended, and I agree that it was a good joke.
My lack of reply i
2011/2/19 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
> 2011/2/19 Janek Warchoł :
>> 2011/2/19 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
>>> I also updated the issue. In summary, I don't think the issue is a
>>> problem, and I think fixing it is contraproductive.
>>
>> I'm not sure if i made myself clear. *I've already prepared* a
>> modificati
2011/2/19 David Kastrup :
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> PS Graham, i'm sorry if you felt offended by that kiss thing - i meant
>> it as a joke only, referring to what you said to Owen Tuz at frogs
>> list:
>>
>> 2010/11/15 Graham Percival :
>>> (...)
>
> I think it quite contraproductive to offer k
2011/2/19 Janek Warchoł :
> 2011/2/19 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
>> 2011/2/17 Janek Warchoł :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wanted to make Graham happy, so looked through the tracker, picked
>>> an existing frog issue and made a patch without discussing it for 5
>>> hours.
>>> :)
>>> It's issue 1489 (make regtests end
2011/2/19 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
> 2011/2/17 Janek Warchoł :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to make Graham happy, so looked through the tracker, picked
>> an existing frog issue and made a patch without discussing it for 5
>> hours.
>> :)
>> It's issue 1489 (make regtests end on a barline).
>> I think it doesn'
2011/2/17 Janek Warchoł :
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to make Graham happy, so looked through the tracker, picked
> an existing frog issue and made a patch without discussing it for 5
> hours.
> :)
> It's issue 1489 (make regtests end on a barline).
> I think it doesn't make sense to post it on Rietveld...
Janek Warchoł writes:
> PS Graham, i'm sorry if you felt offended by that kiss thing - i meant
> it as a joke only, referring to what you said to Owen Tuz at frogs
> list:
>
> 2010/11/15 Graham Percival :
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Owen Tuz wrote:
>>> Hi -
>>> Having talked about C++
2011/2/19 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
> 2011/2/18 Janek Warchoł :
>
>> I expected that resulting file build/out/test-results/index.html,
>> containing comparisons between unmodified and modified regtests, will
>> show differencies in the 67 regtests i changed. But surprisingly it
>> shows many more differen
2011/2/18 Janek Warchoł :
> I expected that resulting file build/out/test-results/index.html,
> containing comparisons between unmodified and modified regtests, will
> show differencies in the 67 regtests i changed. But surprisingly it
> shows many more differencies in files i didn't change - even
2011/2/17 Graham Percival :
> On 2/17/11, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> I wanted to make Graham happy, so looked through the tracker, picked
>> an existing frog issue and made a patch without discussing it for 5
>> hours.
>
> Yay! :)
May i have a kiss?
;P
>> Unfortunately i got an error and i don't u
On 2/17/11, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> I wanted to make Graham happy, so looked through the tracker, picked
> an existing frog issue and made a patch without discussing it for 5
> hours.
Yay! :)
> I think it doesn't make sense to post it on Rietveld...
> It's here (112 kB, too big for an attachment
Hi,
I wanted to make Graham happy, so looked through the tracker, picked
an existing frog issue and made a patch without discussing it for 5
hours.
:)
It's issue 1489 (make regtests end on a barline).
I think it doesn't make sense to post it on Rietveld...
It's here (112 kB, too big for an attachm
16 matches
Mail list logo
