This is the accidental.ly regtest:
\version "2.12.0"
\header{
texidoc="
Accidentals work: the second note does not get a sharp. The third and
fourth show forced and cautionary accidentals.
"
}
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
foo = \relative c'' { \key as \m
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> This is the accidental.ly regtest:
[...]
> It produces the attached image, which looks rather odd, since it has
> an accidental of natural-#. I'm guessing that this is because the key
> sig is flats, and therefore the flat goes to natural bef
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: accidental.ly regtest
"Phil Holmes" writes:
This is the accidental.ly regtest:
[...]
It produces the attached image, which looks rather odd, since it
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 11:32 AM
> Subject: Re: accidental.ly regtest
>
>
>> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>>
>>> This is the acciden
"David Kastrup" wrote in message
news:87zks835z9@lola.goethe.zz...
"Phil Holmes" writes:
Well - because it's unusual. Far more common to have a sharp on a
natural note in the key sig, or a natural on a flat, for example.
And a regtest should not test unusual things?
I still fail to s
On Tue 14 Dec 2010, 12:29 Phil Holmes wrote:
> "David Kastrup" wrote in message
> news:87zks835z9@lola.goethe.zz...
> >"Phil Holmes" writes:
>
> >>Well - because it's unusual. Far more common to have a sharp on a
> >>natural note in the key sig, or a natural on a flat, for example.
> >
> >A
On Dec 14, 2010, at 5:45 AM, "Dmytro O. Redchuk"
wrote:
> On Tue 14 Dec 2010, 12:29 Phil Holmes wrote:
>> "David Kastrup" wrote in message
>> news:87zks835z9@lola.goethe.zz...
>>> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>>
Well - because it's unusual. Far more common to have a sharp on a
natura
2010/12/14 Phil Holmes :
> It produces the attached image, which looks rather odd, since it has an
> accidental of natural-#. I'm guessing that this is because the key sig is
> flats, and therefore the flat goes to natural before it goes to sharp, but
> it looked odd to my eye and that of another
Jan Warchoł writes:
> 2010/12/14 Phil Holmes :
>> It produces the attached image, which looks rather odd, since it has an
>> accidental of natural-#. I'm guessing that this is because the key sig is
>> flats, and therefore the flat goes to natural before it goes to sharp, but
>> it looked odd to
Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, December 14, 2010 12:55 PM
On Dec 14, 2010, at 5:45 AM, "Dmytro O. Redchuk"
wrote:
I fail to see why this test (accidental.ly) would be less
valuable
if there
would be "\key c \major", let's say.
Because you want to ensure that it behaves properly. The best f
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Sorensen"
The best fix,
IMO, would be to add "The first note has a natural followed by a
sharp" at the beginning of the description.
Thanks,
Carl
Agreed. I've put that in my list of changes to be made to regtests.
--
Phil Holmes
___
On Tue 14 Dec 2010, 15:12 Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, December 14, 2010 12:55 PM
> >
> >On Dec 14, 2010, at 5:45 AM, "Dmytro O. Redchuk"
> > wrote:
> >
> >>I fail to see why this test (accidental.ly) would be less
> >>valuable
> >>if there
> >>would be "\key c \major", let'
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> "David Kastrup" wrote:
>>
>> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>
>>> Well - because it's unusual. Far more common to have a sharp on a
>>> natural note in the key sig, or a natural on a flat, for example.
>>
>> And a regtest should not test unusual thin
13 matches
Mail list logo
