On 2010-10-07 04:11, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Mark Polesky mailto:markpole...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
Joe Neeman wrote:
> I would argue that the baseline is more natural then the
> bottom. Moreover, using the baseline as a reference point
> will result in m
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Well, so many extensive replies to respond to! It's great,
> but it makes for a long post, and I do hope the thread
> participants read to the end; there's a lot of relevant
> stuff for everyone here. Thanks.
>
> * * * * * * * * * *
>
> Joe
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:50:20AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Further to my suggestion to leave the renaming to GLISS,
> so far there have been only comments supporting the
> renaming, even from Joe. Since no discussion seems
> to be necessary, do you think it might be better to
> change th
Mark Polesky:
>> Personally, I think we should add a new variable to
>> control the spacing between a markup and the bottom
>> margin. We could call it bottom-markup-spacing for now,
>> but see this post for my proposed variable renaming:
Joe Neeman:
>
> This is easy enough to add (and the naming
Well, so many extensive replies to respond to! It's great,
but it makes for a long post, and I do hope the thread
participants read to the end; there's a lot of relevant
stuff for everyone here. Thanks.
* * * * * * * * * *
Joe Neeman wrote:
> I would argue that the baseline is more natural then
Mark Polesky wrote Tuesday, October 05, 2010 7:09 PM
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-10/msg00070.html
Let me know what you guys think; it would be nice to achieve
consensus on this one.
I'm with Carl on this. I agree with all his comments.
Further to my suggestion to
On 2010-10-05 21:53, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 10/5/10 12:09 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
Of the three, bottom-system-spacing is slightly more
complicated, since it currently controls the spacing below
systems *and* markups, when either is the last on a page.
So the natural attachment point for syst
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> WRT the flexible vertical spacing dimensions, the upper
> attachment points for 'space and 'minimum-distance currently
> align with the Y-coordinate of the origin (0,0) of the upper
> item. For systems this is the middle line of the nearest
On 10/5/10 12:09 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> WRT the flexible vertical spacing dimensions, the upper
> attachment points for 'space and 'minimum-distance currently
> align with the Y-coordinate of the origin (0,0) of the upper
> item. For systems this is the middle line of the nearest
> staff, a
WRT the flexible vertical spacing dimensions, the upper
attachment points for 'space and 'minimum-distance currently
align with the Y-coordinate of the origin (0,0) of the upper
item. For systems this is the middle line of the nearest
staff, and for markups this is the highest point of the
markup.
10 matches
Mail list logo
