Re: bug in articulate.ly

2013-03-07 Thread Zefram
David Kastrup wrote: Do you intend creating a fix for issue 3204? The fix is to perform the single expression substitution that I described, on the line identified by the error message, which is the only place such an expression appears. I thought my description was clear enough, but as it's

Re: bug in articulate.ly

2013-03-03 Thread David Kastrup
Zefram zef...@fysh.org writes: David Kastrup wrote: articulate.ly:446:13: In procedure map in expression (map (lambda # #)): articulate.ly:446:13: Wrong number of arguments to #primitive-generic map Oh, hmm. Oops. The expression (map (lambda (alt) (list (ly:music-deep-copy

Re: bug in articulate.ly

2013-02-26 Thread Zefram
David Kastrup wrote: articulate.ly:446:13: In procedure map in expression (map (lambda # #)): articulate.ly:446:13: Wrong number of arguments to #primitive-generic map Oh, hmm. Oops. The expression (map (lambda (alt) (list (ly:music-deep-copy body) alt))) should be (map

bug in articulate.ly

2013-02-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
[cd03b4ac] I just got this: articulate.ly:446:13: In procedure map in expression (map (lambda # #)): articulate.ly:446:13: Wrong number of arguments to #primitive-generic map using this input: \version 2.17.13 \include articulate.ly \relative c' { \unfoldRepeats \articulate {

Re: bug in articulate.ly

2013-02-24 Thread David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes: [cd03b4ac] I just got this: articulate.ly:446:13: In procedure map in expression (map (lambda # #)): articulate.ly:446:13: Wrong number of arguments to #primitive-generic map using this input: \version 2.17.13 \include articulate.ly

Re: bug in articulate.ly

2013-02-24 Thread Federico Bruni
Il 24/02/2013 16:02, David Kastrup ha scritto: Can the bug team register a bug for it? If we don't get a response in about two days from the original author, I'd suggest reverting it. added as: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3204 -- Federico