RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-28 Thread James Lowe
Hello, )-Original Message- )From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:jann...@gnu.org] )Sent: 27 May 2011 18:22 )To: James Lowe )Cc: -Eluze; lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7] ) ) )I have no idea. We need a system that reproduces the error to play with. )Up till now

Re: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread -Eluze
in context: http://old.nabble.com/developers-on-Windows--7--tp31711007p31715340.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: -Eluze elu...@gmail.com To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 12:49 PM Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7] Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: I could use some help from a developer who can do some testing on Windows 7 (64 bit?) SP1. See

RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread James Lowe
Eluze, )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of eluze )Sent: 27 May 2011 13:37 )To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Phil Holmes )Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7] ) )Am

RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread James Lowe
: developers on Windows [7] )) ))Am 27.05.2011, 14:20 Uhr, schrieb Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net: )) )) - Original Message - From: -Eluze elu...@gmail.com ) To: )lilypond-devel@gnu.org ) Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 12:49 PM ) )Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7] ) ) ) ) ) Jan )Nieuwenhuizen

RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread -Eluze
)To: eluze; lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Phil Holmes )Subject: RE: developers on Windows [7] )Importance: Low ) )Eluze, ) ))-Original Message- ))From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org ))[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] )On )Behalf

RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread James Lowe
Hello )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of -Eluze )Sent: 27 May 2011 15:29 )To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: RE: developers on Windows [7] ) ) )yes, that's

Re: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
James Lowe writes: OK I will need to test this specific windows version. One more question, did you apply SP1 as a separate Patch or did it 'come' preinstalled? Just one more question: I would very much like a bug report using a regular windows 7 SP1 installed in a virtual machine; so that

RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread James Lowe
Jan )-Original Message- )From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:jann...@gnu.org] )Sent: 27 May 2011 15:41 )To: James Lowe )Cc: -Eluze; lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7] ) )James Lowe writes: ) ) OK I will need to test this specific windows version. ) ) One more

RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread -Eluze
Of -Eluze )Sent: 27 May 2011 15:29 )To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: RE: developers on Windows [7] ) ) )yes, that's exactly the example i have copied/pasted! )Eluze [James' reply:] OK I will need to test this specific windows version. One more question, did you apply SP1 as a separate

Re: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
James Lowe writes: James, No problem. Although be aware that while I take the point of the virus scanner, the system I am 'testing' on at the moment to reproduce the problem is my work desktop and that has always had the same Virus Checker installed and the same version and this is not a MS

developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-26 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
I could use some help from a developer who can do some testing on Windows 7 (64 bit?) SP1. See this bug: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1562 I'm trying to get this one nailed, and am getting a lot of help, but it's still very clumsy for a Windows noob like me, without