On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 09:08:46PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
What do people think about the doc reorg shown in:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/general/Manuals.html
(and the actual manual
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 08:12:26PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Le dimanche 27 septembre 2009 à 13:57 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :
What do people think about the doc reorg shown in:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/general/Manuals.html
(and the actual manual pages, of
Quoting John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com:
Le dimanche 27 septembre 2009 à 19:08 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :
I'm wondering if we can call them Function index and Concept
index. Or something like that. It just seems weird to have a
LilyPond index for every manual.
Maybe Function
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 06:23:12PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Quoting John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com:
Le dimanche 27 septembre 2009 à 19:08 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :
I'm wondering if we can call them Function index and Concept
index. Or something like that. It just seems
2009/9/27 John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com:
A few files have been moved in English docs, could somebody do the same
for translated docs? I'm asking just in case somebody may volunteer,
otherwise I'll do this after October 5th and not before I get an
Internet connection at home.
Ah,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 05:56:27PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
2009/9/27 John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com:
A few files have been moved in English docs, could somebody do the same
for translated docs? I'm asking just in case somebody may volunteer,
otherwise I'll do this after
2009/9/28 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Really? I could have sworn that I did the touch
Documentation/*.te?? test... or maybe this doesn't trigger a full
rebuild after all?
That won't rebuild the translations though, will it?
Here's the error message I got:
make[3]: *** No rule
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
What do people think about the doc reorg shown in:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/general/Manuals.html
(and the actual manual pages, of course)
Is it worth mentioning in the essay page that the
What do people think about the doc reorg shown in:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/general/Manuals.html
(and the actual manual pages, of course)
I think I have the balance between Learning and Usage good now.
The only remaining issues are:
1) Learning B. Scheme tutorial -- do we
On 9/27/09 6:57 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
What do people think about the doc reorg shown in:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/general/Manuals.html
(and the actual manual pages, of course)
I think I have the balance between Learning and Usage good
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:15:30AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 9/27/09 6:57 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
1) Learning B. Scheme tutorial -- do we want to keep this here, or
integrate into Learning 4? Or _possibly_ make a Learning 5
Programming inside LilyPond?
Le dimanche 27 septembre 2009 à 17:37 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :
How much of scheme do we get into, though? I mean, what about
moving it back into Notation?
This would be wrong: even if we expanded it up to make a big chapter, it
would not become reference documentation (we alreadhy have
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 07:55:32PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Le dimanche 27 septembre 2009 à 17:37 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :
As far as I'm concerned, as long as newbies know that it's
*possible* to do all sorts of funky stuff with this magical scheme
stuff, that's all they need to
Le dimanche 27 septembre 2009 à 13:57 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :
What do people think about the doc reorg shown in:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/general/Manuals.html
(and the actual manual pages, of course)
I think the frame Read it now is superfluous, a simple link Read
Le dimanche 27 septembre 2009 à 19:08 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :
I'm wondering if we can call them Function index and Concept
index. Or something like that. It just seems weird to have a
LilyPond index for every manual.
Maybe Function and concept index, as this index actually merges
On 9/27/09 11:55 AM, John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
Le dimanche 27 septembre 2009 à 17:37 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :
How much of scheme do we get into, though? I mean, what about
moving it back into Notation?
This would be wrong: even if we expanded it up to make a
16 matches
Mail list logo
