2011/7/3 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 14:58:50 schrieb Jan Warchoł:
>> 2011/7/3 Francisco Vila :
>> > A pity it goes down sooo frequently, I ignore if it's hardware or
>> > configuration to blame.
>>
>> I hope we will resolve this when we discuss "Subdomains of
>> *.lilypond.org
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 15:17:10 schrieb Graham Percival:
> The best way to help LSR become more stable is to learn how to
> install tomcat. I think that's some kind of java website thingie.
> If you know (or can learn) how to do that, then please get in
> touch with Reinhold to help him do the
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 14:58:50 schrieb Jan Warchoł:
> 2011/7/3 Francisco Vila :
> > 2011/6/28 Graham Percival :
> >> If somebody here *does* care, then speak up. Please note:
> > Sorry for the very late answer. I only wanted to say that LSR has been
> > very helpful until now, both for me and
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 02:58:50PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> 2011/7/3 Francisco Vila :
> > A pity it goes down sooo frequently, I ignore if it's hardware or
> > configuration to blame.
>
> I hope we will resolve this when we discuss "Subdomains of
> *.lilypond.org" GOP issue.
That will only hel
2011/7/3 Francisco Vila :
> 2011/6/28 Graham Percival :
>> If somebody here *does* care, then speak up. Please note:
>
> Sorry for the very late answer. I only wanted to say that LSR has been
> very helpful until now, both for me and the members of the
> Spanish-speaking community. I've found that
2011/6/28 Graham Percival :
> If somebody here *does* care, then speak up. Please note:
Sorry for the very late answer. I only wanted to say that LSR has been
very helpful until now, both for me and the members of the
Spanish-speaking community. I've found that most of the questions in
the list c
2011/6/29 Reinhold Kainhofer
> No, that won't happen. LSR is something like a searchable FAQ for both common
> cases and special cases. Unless the manual gets some REALLY good search
> capabilities and anchors that you jump just to the right point without having
> to read through whole sections to
henever somebody with git access touches LSR, it's a net loss for
> the project.
>
that's a barrage to all musicians not programming (or knowing git)!
hoping my message is clear - don't shut off LSR, improve it in this or
another way, make technical or new semantic improvements,
Am Mittwoch 29 Juni 2011, 23:11:33 schrieben Sie:
1> Phil, let's work this way: everytime you're in doubt (or on holiday)
> about anything lsr-related, or every time you approve a docs-tagged
> snippet, please give me a ping so I don't forget to push an lsr-update
> onto the git master repo.
>
> I
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> Okay, you are simply seeing LSR as an input pipe for doc material. I see it as
> a very useful, separate entity, which provides a quick, searchable FAQ, which
> is able to display just the requested information in an easy way.
That's ex
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:30:49AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > I'm suggesting that we just dump the whole thing on Phil. He can
> > choose how picky (or not) to be about explanations, indentation,
> > looking for duplicates, etc
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Carl Sorensen"
So if Phil is willing to take it over, whatever he wants to do is fine
with
me.
That sounds like you're agreeing with my main suggestion: dump it
on Phil. :)
Cheers,
- Graham
I've already told Graham I'm happy t
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 04:39:39PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I've already told Graham I'm happy to maintain it from an authoriser
> point of view.
I'll also be wanting you to do CG 7.4 LSR to git, once you have
git access. Or maybe even before, since you could send a patch to
James for pushing.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:56:28PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011, 19:16:36 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > Ideally so. In practice, it seems like only "experts" (or at
> > least, developers and contributors) are doing anything to maintain
> > it.
>
> So, where's the p
Am Mittwoch, 29. Juni 2011, 17:33:33 schrieb Graham Percival:
> I'd like to be able to tell "expert users" that the easiest way
> for them improve the documentation is by adding snippets, and that
> these would be added to our docs in a timely fashion. But if
> we're looking at an average of 1 imp
Am Mittwoch, 29. Juni 2011, 10:30:49 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
> I must disagree. People have posted tons of interesting snippets
> there, ranging from the basic "how to display a whole note" to
> advanced tricks used by Eluze, Gilles Thibaut, Jay Anderson&al. (there
> are even quite advanced sni
Am Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011, 17:48:24 schrieb Graham Percival:
> I was discussing LSR with Phil, and it occurred to me that I
> should raise the question here. What do we want from LSR?
>
> As far as I'm concerned, no I don't care about LSR; the people who
> wanted it in the first place aren't mai
Am Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011, 19:16:36 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > LSR is a place to put snippets that some people think are useful, without
> > the filtering of any "expert".
>
> Ideally so. In practice, it seems like only "experts" (or at
> least, developers and contributors) are doing anything
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> As far as I'm concerned, no I don't care about LSR;
Shocker. What else is new? :-)
> the people who
> wanted it in the first place aren't maintaining it; we haven't had
> a flood of users volunteering to take care of it. This experiment
On 6/28/11 11:16 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:45:36AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> On 6/28/11 9:48 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> ...snip various LSR discussion...
>
>> I'm not sure I agree with this.
>
> I'm not certain what the "this" is that you're disag
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:45:36AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 6/28/11 9:48 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
...snip various LSR discussion...
> I'm not sure I agree with this.
I'm not certain what the "this" is that you're disagreeing with. :)
> LSR is a place to put snippets that some peop
On 6/28/11 9:48 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> I was discussing LSR with Phil, and it occurred to me that I
> should raise the question here. What do we want from LSR?
>
> As far as I'm concerned, no I don't care about LSR; the people who
> wanted it in the first place aren't maintaining it; we
I was discussing LSR with Phil, and it occurred to me that I
should raise the question here. What do we want from LSR?
As far as I'm concerned, no I don't care about LSR; the people who
wanted it in the first place aren't maintaining it; we haven't had
a flood of users volunteering to take care o
23 matches
Mail list logo
