continuation of
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-07/msg0.html
James wrote:
>> Hey, why isn't this patch on the countdown list?
>> https://codereview.appspot.com/10759043/
>>
>> I posted it to -devel here:
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-06/msg
Mark Polesky writes:
> Should I start a new tracker issue for every little change I
> want to make?
Yes. It's easy to do with git-cl.
> That seems excessive.
It gives independent verification.
> Should I just push to staging? That seems counter to the
> spirit of the whole countdown thin
hello,
On 05/07/13 19:55, David Kastrup wrote:
Mark Polesky writes:
Should I start a new tracker issue for every little change I
want to make?
Yes. It's easy to do with git-cl.
That seems excessive.
It gives independent verification.
Should I just push to staging? That seems counte
James wrote:
> What's the rush?
I never said anything about a rush.
My question was "What's the right way to do this?".
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
