Re: guile 2.0 and ghostscript 9.0

2011-06-08 Thread Ian Hulin
On 07/06/11 02:32, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Graham Percival > wrote: >> What's the plan+status of these? >> >> I'd like to have the first release candidate for 2.16 in 3-4 >> months. Â If we think that we can sort out any problems with those >> dependencies... or an

Re: guile 2.0 and ghostscript 9.0

2011-06-06 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > What's the plan+status of these? > > I'd like to have the first release candidate for 2.16 in 3-4 > months.  If we think that we can sort out any problems with those > dependencies... or any other build dependencies, for that > matter... the

Re: guile 2.0 and ghostscript 9.0

2011-06-06 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Graham Percival writes: > I'd like to have the first release candidate for 2.16 in 3-4 > months. If we think that we can sort out any problems with those > dependencies... or any other build dependencies, for that > matter... then let's start merging them. If not, they can wait > until 2.17. Gh

guile 2.0 and ghostscript 9.0

2011-06-06 Thread Graham Percival
What's the plan+status of these? I'd like to have the first release candidate for 2.16 in 3-4 months. If we think that we can sort out any problems with those dependencies... or any other build dependencies, for that matter... then let's start merging them. If not, they can wait until 2.17. Pro