RE: http://codereview.appspot.com/3667041

2011-02-04 Thread James Lowe
Carl, -Original Message- From: Carl Sorensen [mailto:c_soren...@byu.edu] Sent: 04 February 2011 17:58 To: James Lowe; lilypond-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: http://codereview.appspot.com/3667041 Importance: Low > No, your edits of his work will be *your* work. Well if it's compl

Re: http://codereview.appspot.com/3667041

2011-02-04 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 2/4/11 9:26 AM, "James Lowe" wrote: > Carl, > > -Original Message- > From: Carl Sorensen [mailto:c_soren...@byu.edu] > Sent: 04 February 2011 14:31 > To: James Lowe; lilypond-devel@gnu.org > Subject: Re: http://codereview.appspot.com/3667041 > >

RE: http://codereview.appspot.com/3667041

2011-02-04 Thread James Lowe
Carl, -Original Message- From: Carl Sorensen [mailto:c_soren...@byu.edu] Sent: 04 February 2011 14:31 To: James Lowe; lilypond-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: http://codereview.appspot.com/3667041 I think that for purposes of giving credit where it's due, it would be nice to see if yo

Re: http://codereview.appspot.com/3667041

2011-02-04 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 2/4/11 6:21 AM, "James Lowe" wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to continue work on this patch because there is a lot of good > stuff here, but it does still require a fair amount of editing down, but > of course I cannot upload changes because I don't own the issue. > > So I'd like to create a ne

http://codereview.appspot.com/3667041

2011-02-04 Thread James Lowe
Hello, I'd like to continue work on this patch because there is a lot of good stuff here, but it does still require a fair amount of editing down, but of course I cannot upload changes because I don't own the issue. So I'd like to create a new issue with these changes + my own edits incorporat