issues to verify -> no more releases

2012-02-03 Thread Graham Percival
Now that the Patchy staging-merge is running ok, it's time to force the next issue: I will not be making any more releases, stable or unstable, as long as there are issues to verify relating to a previously-released version. At the time of this writing, this means that if *ANY* issue on this

Re: issues to verify -> no more releases

2012-02-03 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:14:52PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > > At the time of this writing, this means that if *ANY* issue on this > > list: > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=7 > > does *NOT* say "fixed_2_15_28", there will be no release. > > "

Re: issues to verify -> no more releases

2012-02-03 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:14:52PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> Graham Percival writes: >> >> > At the time of this writing, this means that if *ANY* issue on this >> > list: >> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=7 >> > does *NOT* say "fixed_2_15_28"

Re: issues to verify -> no more releases

2012-02-03 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 02:14:41PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > > Programmers gives things fixed_* tags. > > You wish. Heh. Normative vs. descriptive. :) Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@

Re: issues to verify -> no more releases

2012-02-03 Thread Colin Hall
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:14:52PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > At the time of this writing, this means that if *ANY* issue on this > > list: > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=7 > > does *NOT* say "fixed_2_15_28", there will be no release. > > "ve

Re: issues to verify -> no more releases

2012-02-03 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:40:49PM +, Colin Hall wrote: > > Looks like Dave has marked all the outstanding fixes as verified while I was > busy testing 1416. almost; there's still 2149. > My understanding is that they still all need to be tested. I'm travelling > from Saturday but I'll try

Re: issues to verify -> no more releases

2012-02-03 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:40:49PM +, Colin Hall wrote: >> >> Looks like Dave has marked all the outstanding fixes as verified >> while I was busy testing 1416. > > almost; there's still 2149. You could have stowed the whip for a few minutes. There is a new patch

Re: issues to verify -> no more releases

2012-02-03 Thread Colin Hall
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:45:26PM +, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:40:49PM +, Colin Hall wrote: > > > My understanding is that they still all need to be tested. I'm travelling > > from Saturday but I'll try to get through as many as I can between now and > > then.

Re: issues to verify -> no more releases

2012-02-03 Thread David Kastrup
Colin Hall writes: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:45:26PM +, Graham Percival wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:40:49PM +, Colin Hall wrote: >> >> > My understanding is that they still all need to be tested. I'm >> > travelling from Saturday but I'll try to get through as many as I >> >