Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-09 Thread Joseph Wakeling
John Mandereau wrote: > Le mardi 08 septembre 2009 à 12:30 +0200, Joseph Wakeling a écrit : >> I note that texi2html is only 1.78 on my system (it's the version native >> to Ubuntu Karmic). Is this going to be a blocker? > > If you want HTML output of the documentation, yes. OK, that's tolerable

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-08 Thread John Mandereau
Le mardi 08 septembre 2009 à 12:46 +0200, Joseph Wakeling a écrit : > It's trying to build BUILD-DIR/out/lybook-db/snippet-names--494188324.ly > whose content is: I meant, what is the exact snippet that fails? Does it still fail if you compile it with the trick described in HACKING and with EPS b

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-08 Thread Joseph Wakeling
John Mandereau wrote: > Le mardi 08 septembre 2009 à 12:30 +0200, Joseph Wakeling a écrit : >> [century_schoolbook_l_serif_3.0673828125]Segmentation fault (core >> dumped) >> command failed: /home/myusername/code/lily/out/bin/lilypond > > What is the snippet that causes a segmentation fault? It'

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-08 Thread John Mandereau
Le mardi 08 septembre 2009 à 12:30 +0200, Joseph Wakeling a écrit : > [century_schoolbook_l_serif_3.0673828125]Segmentation fault (core > dumped) > command failed: /home/myusername/code/lily/out/bin/lilypond What is the snippet that causes a segmentation fault? > I note that texi2html is only 1

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-08 Thread Joseph Wakeling
John Mandereau wrote: > Le dimanche 06 septembre 2009 à 09:30 +0200, Joseph Wakeling a écrit : >> I'm not sure how to interpret what's there -- presumably that only a >> subset of the intended output has been written to collated-files.pdf? > > As Graham pointed out, you didn't paste the relevant p

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-08 Thread John Mandereau
Le samedi 05 septembre 2009 à 00:43 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : > 3) we might be switching to SCons "soon", so there's unfortunately > little interest in tracking down the above problems. As always, > patches appreciated if you're particularly curious about this > issue. I won't suppo

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-06 Thread John Mandereau
Le dimanche 06 septembre 2009 à 09:30 +0200, Joseph Wakeling a écrit : > I'm not sure how to interpret what's there -- presumably that only a > subset of the intended output has been written to collated-files.pdf? As Graham pointed out, you didn't paste the relevant part of the log, but the error

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-06 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 09:30:06AM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote: > Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > It might help to look into said log file... Usually, the error messages > > towards > > the end will tell you something about the problem. > > I'm not sure how to interpret what's there -- presumably

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-06 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 09:20:25AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Am Sonntag, 6. September 2009 08:56:22 schrieb Joseph Wakeling: > > because I've been > > having trouble building the docs proper: I always end up with an error, Sorry to belabor the point, but are you **certain** that you've do

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-06 Thread Joseph Wakeling
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > It might help to look into said log file... Usually, the error messages > towards > the end will tell you something about the problem. I'm not sure how to interpret what's there -- presumably that only a subset of the intended output has been written to collated-files

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-06 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Sonntag, 6. September 2009 08:56:22 schrieb Joseph Wakeling: > because I've been > having trouble building the docs proper: I always end up with an error, > > Output written on collated-files.pdf (40 pages, 168642 bytes). > Transcript written on col

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-05 Thread Joseph Wakeling
Graham Percival wrote: > Umm, I was joking. Well, kind-of joking. Yes, that's the only > way you can do it, but no, I don't recommend it. I don't think > that Joseph is desperately awaiting HTML output... actually, I'm > pretty certain he builds them himself, anyway. And he's the only > person

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-05 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 08:19:31AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Graham Percival wrote Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:43 AM >> For Trevor: the only way *you* can "touch" a file is by making a >> git change to it. So if you really wanted to make the NR rebuilt, >> you'd have to push a nonsense

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-05 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:43 AM On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:35:06AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: Am Samstag, 5. September 2009 00:12:44 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Friday, September 04, 2009 10:51 PM > > It seems that the NR was really las

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:35:06AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Am Samstag, 5. September 2009 00:12:44 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > > Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Friday, September 04, 2009 10:51 PM > > > It seems that the NR was really last compiled on September 1. > > > The dependencies are all li

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-04 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Samstag, 5. September 2009 00:12:44 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Friday, September 04, 2009 10:51 PM > > It seems that the NR was really last compiled on September 1. > > The dependencies are all listed in out-www/notation.dep.

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-04 Thread Trevor Daniels
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Friday, September 04, 2009 10:51 PM Am Freitag, 4. September 2009 23:12:00 schrieb Trevor Daniels: Graham Percival wrote Friday, September 04, 2009 10:03 PM > Oh, I see it now. Remember that we currently need to touch any > docs we want updated. I've just done this,

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-04 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 4. September 2009 22:54:38 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > Reinhold > > The last doc update on your server was on > 1 Sep - has something broken? It was last compiled on Sept 4, 4:24. However, I'm only removing - -) Documentation/out-www/ind

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-04 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 4. September 2009 23:12:00 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > Graham Percival wrote Friday, September 04, 2009 10:03 PM > > Oh, I see it now. Remember that we currently need to touch any > > docs we want updated. I've just done this, so the 05SEP0

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-04 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Friday, September 04, 2009 10:03 PM On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:54:38PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: The last doc update on your server was on 1 Sep - has something broken? I see there are several broken links following Graham's recent reorganisation. Let me know if this

Re: kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:54:38PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: > The last doc update on your server was on > 1 Sep - has something broken? I see there > are several broken links following Graham's > recent reorganisation. Let me know if this > is the problem and I'll fix them. Looks fine now; i

kainhofer docs not updating

2009-09-04 Thread Trevor Daniels
Reinhold The last doc update on your server was on 1 Sep - has something broken? I see there are several broken links following Graham's recent reorganisation. Let me know if this is the problem and I'll fix them. Trevor ___ lilypond-devel maili