Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-11 Thread James
Hello, On 10 December 2011 23:27, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:06 PM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for testing, James. :) Downloading now. My Internet connection is not that fast, so I'll leave it run over night (it's late here) and

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-11 Thread James
Hello (again).. On 11 December 2011 11:49, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, On 10 December 2011 23:27, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:06 PM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for testing, James. :) Downloading now. My Internet

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-11 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:49:51AM +, James wrote: --snip-- james@james-OptiPlex-990:~/Downloads$ md5sum ubuntu-lilydev-remix-2.0.iso ubuntu-lilydev-remix-2.0.iso.md5 b394cb547a558559e21dfdaf702ebe01 ubuntu-lilydev-remix-2.0.iso 4067a00cfe9d8dc501fbeb32ab8f3020

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-11 Thread James
Hello, On 11 December 2011 11:52, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:49:51AM +, James wrote: --snip-- james@james-OptiPlex-990:~/Downloads$ md5sum ubuntu-lilydev-remix-2.0.iso ubuntu-lilydev-remix-2.0.iso.md5

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-11 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 5:57 AM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:    was expecting 11.04 (or whichever 11.x I thought we were planning). We are using 10.04 again; we're just updating the extra software. Yes this is because 10.04 is a long-term support release. Next LTS is 12.04, coming out

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-11 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:16:54AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote: It worked in a VM for me, hopefully it will for you too. One mistake I found is that the desktop launcher for the CG links to the 2.13 version instead of 2.15 (*facepalm*). Forgot about that. I can fix and make a new image. hold

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-11 Thread James
Jonathan, Graham et al. On 11 December 2011 12:16, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 5:57 AM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: was expecting 11.04 (or whichever 11.x I thought we were planning). We are using 10.04 again; we're just updating the extra

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:35:36AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote: I could probably do it again. Maybe Debian would be better base so it wouldn't need upgrading as much? This upgrade is to match our changing

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:53 AM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: hello and if you need someone to test it let me know. I've been using nothing else but lilydev and virtual box to compile and patch LP these last couple of years. Thanks James that'd be great. I'll post a link for you when

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 06:09:22AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Ok I can make these changes to the current setup. Haven't heard of $LILYPOND_GIT but I guess it's in the CG so I'll take a look. export LILYPOND_GIT=$HOME/lilypond-git/ export LILYPOND_WEB_MEDIA_GIT=$HOME/lilypond-web-media-git/

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 06:09:22AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Ok I can make these changes to the current setup. Haven't heard of $LILYPOND_GIT but I guess it's in the CG so I'll take a look. export

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:01:27AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: export LILYPOND_GIT=$HOME/lilypond-git/ export LILYPOND_WEB_MEDIA_GIT=$HOME/lilypond-web-media-git/ Thanks, so I just add these to .bashrc right?

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: Thanks, so I just add these to .bashrc right? Yes. Does this mean the lily-git.tcl script has changed too? lily-git.tcl has not changed yet, but hopefully it will soon.  And if it doesn't, there's no big

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:18:40AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Ok great. Compiling fontforge 20110222 with --enable-double now to test it. shouldn't take long to get new iso ready. Forgive me if this is obvious, but have you done all the things listed here?

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:18:40AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Ok great. Compiling fontforge 20110222 with --enable-double now to test it. shouldn't take long to get new iso ready. Forgive me if this is obvious,

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread Benkő Pál
I suggested it mainly b/c Ubuntu has very different UI in new releases, the Unity DE. For ubuntu 12.04 (next LTS release coming in spring) we may want to switch to xfce or switch to Debian completely. I can do whatever y'all want. Lubuntu? ___

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:53 AM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: and if you need someone to test it let me know. I've been using nothing else but lilydev and virtual box to compile and patch LP these last couple of years. Uploading now. Give it about an hour from the timestamp on this

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Benkő Pál benko@gmail.com wrote: I suggested it mainly b/c Ubuntu has very different UI in new releases, the Unity DE. For ubuntu 12.04 (next LTS release coming in spring) we may want to switch to xfce or switch to Debian completely. I can do whatever y'all

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread James
Hello, On 10 December 2011 14:44, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:53 AM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: and if you need someone to test it let me know. I've been using nothing else but lilydev and virtual box to compile and patch LP these last couple

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-10 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:06 PM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for testing, James. :) Downloading now. My Internet connection is not that fast, so I'll leave it run over night (it's late here) and then have a go at building LP with it tomorrow morning/early afternoon BST. I'll let

lilydev 2.0

2011-12-09 Thread Graham Percival
I think it's time to get this moving: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1964 http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/building-an-ubuntu-distro Who's up for it? Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-09 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: I think it's time to get this moving: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1964 http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/building-an-ubuntu-distro Who's up for it? I could probably

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-09 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:35:36AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote: I could probably do it again. Maybe Debian would be better base so it wouldn't need upgrading as much? This upgrade is to match our changing development requirements, i.e. fontforge 20110222 --enable-double, astyle 2.02, having the

Re: lilydev 2.0

2011-12-09 Thread James
hello On 10 Dec 2011, at 01:38, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:35:36AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote: I could probably do it again. Maybe Debian would be better base so it wouldn't need upgrading as much? This upgrade is to match our changing