Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-08-06 Thread Trevor Daniels
do you think? Trevor - Original Message - From: Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lilypond-devel@gnu.org Cc: Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LilyPond User [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:47 AM Subject: Re: lyrics following

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-08-06 Thread Mats Bengtsson
: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:47 AM Subject: Re: lyrics following split voices 2008/8/5 Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm surprised that nobody answered exactly this question. If you name your main voice 1, then the upper voice of the {...} \\ {...} construct will stay the same Voice context

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-08-06 Thread Trevor Daniels
Mats, you wrote, Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:26 PM Trevor Daniels wrote: So, for the example in question, the NR should certainly state categorically what the voice names are in the various constructs, and examples showing the differences would be fine. But I don't think there is any

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-08-05 Thread Francisco Vila
2008/8/5 Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm surprised that nobody answered exactly this question. If you name your main voice 1, then the upper voice of the {...} \\ {...} construct will stay the same Voice context as the single voice. That's true, it is explained in LM 3.2.1 I'm hearing