Hi there,
well, I didn't read all messages of this thread, but I see two points of
discussion:
1. we already have LSR
2. who likes to use git?
1.: Well, we have LSR, but the current implementation needs a
tomcat-server with mysql. I did use tomcat sometimes and created some
webapps, but as a
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes :
> - Original Message - From: "Janek Warchol"
>> What you said would be true if the snippets were so simple that they
>> never change. But they do change.
>
> Hardly ever. I maintain the current LSR and the changes are so infrequent I
> often forget to check whether
or
this.)
FWIW,
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/maintaining-advanced-power-user-Scheme-functions-tp149155p149479.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
This will be my last post on this.
> - Original Message - From: "Janek Warchol"
>
>> 2013/8/19 Phil Holmes :
>> > However, my other opposition to git for this
>> > purpose is that it's intended as a Version Control system, which is
>> > comp
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes :
> - Original Message - From: "Janek Warchoł"
>
>> 2013/8/19 Phil Holmes :
>> > However, my other opposition to git for this
>> > purpose is that it's intended as a Version Control system, which is
>> > completely unnecessary for the LSR - that's just a simple databa
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Thomas Morley" ; "lilypond-user"
; "Phil Hézaine" ; "David
Nalesnik" ; "LilyPond Developmet Team"
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 3:17 PM
Subj
Hi,
some things were already answered by other people
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes :
> - Original Message - From: "Janek Warchoł"
>> A valid concern, but i have a counterargument: there is a web
>> interface for git that allows you to copy-and-paste code directly in,
>> or alternatively to type
2013/8/19 Werner LEMBERG :
>> Well, one question may be whether git could be an alternate
>> interface into the LSR. In a limited manner, it already is
>> (snippets migrate back from LilyPond git repository into the LSR).
>
> Actually, I like the idea of using git for the LSR *as the storage*.
> E
> Well, one question may be whether git could be an alternate
> interface into the LSR. In a limited manner, it already is
> (snippets migrate back from LilyPond git repository into the LSR).
Actually, I like the idea of using git for the LSR *as the storage*.
Experienced cann access it directly,
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Janek Warchoł"
> To: "Thomas Morley"
> Cc: "lilypond-user" ; "Phil Hézaine"
> ; "David Nalesnik"
> ; "LilyPond Developmet Team"
>
&g
2013/8/19 Urs Liska :
> PS: I'd also second the idea of hosting lilypond on a more accessible server
> (if that doesn't imply complicated side-effects). It is so easy to create a
> fork and open a pull request, I'm sure such a step would increase the number
> of contributions by people who can't or
ssage -
From: Urs Liska
To: Janek Warchoł ; Phil Holmes
Cc: LilyPond Developmet Team ; Thomas Morley ; David Nalesnik ; lilypond-user
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: maintaining advanced power-user Scheme functions
One thing I'd definitely support about this is
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Thomas Morley" ; "lilypond-user"
; "Phil Hézaine" ; "David
Nalesnik" ; "LilyPond Developmet Team"
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 11:02 AM
Subj
One thing I'd definitely support about this is making LSR somewhat version
independent to allow one to have snippets requiring new lily versions.
Maybe providing several lily versions (not necessarily _all_ of course) and use
an appropriate one to compile the snippets. This would also allow us to
One thing I'd definitely support about this is making LSR somewhat version
independent to allow one to have snippets requiring new lily versions.
Maybe providing several lily versions (not necessarily _all_ of course) and use
an appropriate one to compile the snippets. This would also allow us to
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes :
> - Original Message - From: "Janek Warchoł"
>> After some thinking, i came to the conclusion that LSR should be
>> redesigned.
>> Fristly, it should be a git repository, to make collaboration easy -
>> when something's a git repository, i have a habit of contributin
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Thomas Morley"
Cc: "lilypond-user" ; "Phil Hézaine"
; "David Nalesnik" ;
"LilyPond Developmet Team"
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: maintaining advanced
Hi,
2013/8/17 Janek Warchoł :
>
> 2013/8/14 Thomas Morley :
>> The right place for them would be the LSR, _if_ the LSR would be able
>> to compile them and not use a LilyPond-version far too old for many of
>> my ideas.
>>
>> There were some insinuations on the list the last months (or was it a
>>
Hi,
2013/8/14 Thomas Morley :
> 2013/8/14 Janek Warchoł :
>> Harm and David N. (and some other people) write lots of very advanced
>> (and very helpful!) Scheme functions. These funcitons are improved
>> over time, and there is a problem related to that: it's easy to get
>> lost in all the email
Thomas Morley writes:
> That's great!!
> Though, honestly, perhaps you should wait until 2.18. is out. I still hope
> it's coming soon.
You've seen the flurry of discussions and purported fixes (tending to
fall through even the regression tests) about cyclic backend
dependencies regressions? Ev
Hi Pierre,
2013/8/15 Pierre Perol-Schneider :
> Hi Janek, Hi Harm,
>
> 2013/8/14 Thomas Morley
>>
>>
>> So I was annoyed by the lack of help/interest of others and I'm still
>> pissed off.
>>
>
> Sorry for that, I think I totaly missed this discussion.
>
I referred to the last LSR-upgrade startin
Hi Janek, Hi Harm,
2013/8/14 Thomas Morley
>
> So I was annoyed by the lack of help/interest of others and I'm still
> pissed off.
>
>
Sorry for that, I think I totaly missed this discussion.
> Volunteers?
> Be sure that I'd grant support.
>
Sure !
Maybe give me some links where I can find h
2013/8/14 Janek Warchoł :
> Hi,
>
> Harm and David N. (and some other people) write lots of very advanced
> (and very helpful!) Scheme functions. These funcitons are improved
> over time, and there is a problem related to that: it's easy to get
> lost in all the email threads about them, and it's
Hi,
Harm and David N. (and some other people) write lots of very advanced
(and very helpful!) Scheme functions. These funcitons are improved
over time, and there is a problem related to that: it's easy to get
lost in all the email threads about them, and it's not always obvious
where the most rec
24 matches
Mail list logo
