On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Jean-Charles Malahieude
wrote:
> Le 03/04/2012 23:17, Janek Warchoł disait :
>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/janek_warchol/1#
>
> Typos :
>
> Third paragraph in "Deliverables"
>
> - the gap between neighbor obejcts, the differen
Le 03/04/2012 23:17, Janek Warchoł disait :
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:10 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
Looks good! It's much more assertive and professional & it's an easier read as
well. Good luck!
The application should now be publicly visible here:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> I don't know that it makes any difference, but you should do
>
> s/thourough/thorough/
fixed.
> Great job!
Thanks!
Janek
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.
On 4/3/12 3:17 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
>
>The application should now be publicly visible here:
>http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/janek_w
>archol/1#
>
>Please note that i've changed the schedule, and also added a skill
>evaluation as requested by GNU. I've also
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:10 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> Looks good! It's much more assertive and professional & it's an easier read
> as well. Good luck!
The application should now be publicly visible here:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/janek_warchol
On Apr 2, 2012, at 5:05 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 1:55 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
>> It's just the opposite - the use of technical details shows a lack of
>> clarity of understanding, as it attaches importance to things that may
>> change depending on the implement
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 1:55 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> It's just the opposite - the use of technical details shows a lack of
> clarity of understanding, as it attaches importance to things that may
> change depending on the implementation as opposed to design. Stay on the
> design level.
On 4/1/12 1:39 AM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>below is my application, written according to GNU guidelines
>(http://www.gnu.org/software/soc-projects/guidelines.html). What do
>you think about it?
>Also, since this is a new project not mentioned on our GSoC page, i
>need to know who will
On Apr 1, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Do you think i've chosen a good order of attach in my plan?
> My problem is that i will have significantly more time in the second
> half of the project. However, i've read that it's better to start
> with the most important (on thus often most d
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> please do
>
> s/syllabe/syllable/
done, thanks!
> Besides this, it looks nice, and hopefully everything runs fine! BTW,
> expect delays with the schedule :-)
i know :)
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:16 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> O
On Apr 1, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>
> Also, since this is a new project not mentioned on our GSoC page, i
> need to know who will mentor me - Mike? :)
Doable, although if I mentor you you may wind up breaking more things than you
fix!
Below is a diff with some corrections. It's
Janek,
please do
s/syllabe/syllable/
Besides this, it looks nice, and hopefully everything runs fine! BTW,
expect delays with the schedule :-)
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
Hi all,
below is my application, written according to GNU guidelines
(http://www.gnu.org/software/soc-projects/guidelines.html). What do
you think about it?
Also, since this is a new project not mentioned on our GSoC page, i
need to know who will mentor me - Mike? :) (it would be great if
someon
13 matches
Mail list logo
