Am 05.06.2012 08:29, schrieb Marc Hohl:
Hi all,
Am 03.06.2012 22:58, schrieb Thomas Morley:
Hi,
together with Marc Hohl I was working on Issue 1320 for a couple of
weeks.
Now we have a first working version using a new approach to design
BarLines:
Only simple BarLines are predefined e.g "|"
Hi all,
Am 03.06.2012 22:58, schrieb Thomas Morley:
Hi,
together with Marc Hohl I was working on Issue 1320 for a couple of weeks.
Now we have a first working version using a new approach to design BarLines:
Only simple BarLines are predefined e.g "|" "." ":" etc (plus some
exceptions).
Some
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> My recommendation: just pick something you like and run with it.
> Right now this is in the "sour spot" of bikeshedding. We should
> either have a formal discussion (which waits until GLISS), or just
> get something done by you picking arbi
Am 04.06.2012 17:13, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:01:44PM +0200, Marc Hohl wrote:
Am 04.06.2012 13:21, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
How about ! then? It actually has both | and . in it, and it _is_ a
sentence ending punctuation.
I missed something; why not keep . for the thic
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:01:44PM +0200, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Am 04.06.2012 13:21, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> >>How about ! then? It actually has both | and . in it, and it _is_ a
> >>sentence ending punctuation.
I missed something; why not keep . for the thick one? as in the
current "|." ?
> "="
Am 04.06.2012 13:21, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:55 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Werner LEMBERG writes:
Uh, oh, please not a letter. I almost always use seriffed fonts, and
it looks rather strange. What slightly longer but easy to remember
symbolics?
||
Please no. Let
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:55 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> Uh, oh, please not a letter. I almost always use seriffed fonts, and
>> it looks rather strange. What slightly longer but easy to remember
>> symbolics?
>>
>> ||
Please no. Let's keep this one-lettered.
(other
2012/6/4 Werner LEMBERG :
>>> Uh, oh, please not a letter. I almost always use seriffed fonts, and
>>> it looks rather strange. What slightly longer but easy to remember
>>> symbolics?
>>>
>>> |
>>>
>>> ||
>>
>> How about ! then? It actually has both | and . in it, and it _is_ a
>> sentence
>> Uh, oh, please not a letter. I almost always use seriffed fonts, and
>> it looks rather strange. What slightly longer but easy to remember
>> symbolics?
>>
>> |
>>
>> ||
>
> How about ! then? It actually has both | and . in it, and it _is_ a
> sentence ending punctuation.
>
>> || |:
>
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>> Frankly, it always confuses me when i have to code a thick line
>>> using "." - it's very unintuitive. What about changing this to
>>> some other character? Maybe uppercase i? It looks "thicker" -
>>> unless you use a sans-serif font...
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I thought abou
>> Frankly, it always confuses me when i have to code a thick line
>> using "." - it's very unintuitive. What about changing this to
>> some other character? Maybe uppercase i? It looks "thicker" -
>> unless you use a sans-serif font...
>
> +1
>
> I thought about uppercase I, too. "|I" looks n
Am 04.06.2012 09:14, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
together with Marc Hohl I was working on Issue 1320 for a couple of weeks.
Now we have a first working version using a new approach to design BarLines:
wow! Looks very impressive!
Please
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
>
> together with Marc Hohl I was working on Issue 1320 for a couple of weeks.
> Now we have a first working version using a new approach to design BarLines:
wow! Looks very impressive!
> Please note, there was need to change some glyph
13 matches
Mail list logo
