LGTM, much easier to read now!
http://codereview.appspot.com/6448063/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
do.
To be honest, I'd really like to tackle a few other issues which
are far more pressing (in my scores).
I'd also like you to tackle a few other issues which are far more
pressing. In fact, at the moment I can't think of any issue which
is *less* pressing than the IR order of engravers issue
Hi Graham,
And have you decided whether this should just go in the
@knownissues on that page, or should it be a separate section?
I think it should be in the @knownissues.
That's just it -- there isn't anybody to guide you gently into
that good night. The only clue I know about the IR is
Hi Graham et al,
Talking about
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=673
problem with order of \consists
1) Add a sentence about default_bar_line_engraver and
timing_translator (or whatever Werner was talking about on 673). I
know we've already said there order may matter;
WTM?
Based on Werner's specific problem:
Default_bar_line_engraver must come before Timing_translator
This last one is easy to determine by looking at [only] the IR: under
defaultBarType it says This variable is read by [...] Timing translator”.
Actually, it turns out the opposite is
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi Graham et al,
Talking about
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=673
problem with order of \consists
1) Add a sentence about default_bar_line_engraver and
timing_translator (or whatever Werner was talking about on
On 4/28/10 6:41 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi Graham et al,
Talking about
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=673
problem with order of \consists
1) Add a sentence about default_bar_line_engraver and
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 4/28/10 6:41 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
[...]
And if each engraver specifies what engravers it is relying on in a
machine-readable manner (or the respective order in which it wants to be
applied), then Lilypond can actually do the
On 28 April 2010 13:41, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
And if each engraver specifies what engravers it is relying on in a
machine-readable manner (or the respective order in which it wants to be
applied), then Lilypond can actually do the required sorting and figure
out a proper order at
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 06:30:29PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
And if each engraver specifies what engravers it is relying on in a
machine-readable manner (or the respective order in which it wants to be
applied), then Lilypond can actually do the
On 28 April 2010 13:36, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Can anyone explain to me what's going on here, and why the comments in IR
appear to suggest the opposite of what's actually happening?
The comment is obsolete: defaultBarType isn't set by any engraver
(it's a user
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
In Carl's defense, he's horribly busy with end-of-term teaching (which
always penalizes one's real work, namely research) and then has a
conference to deal with. When we deal with open-source volunteer
projects while we have that much stress
On 4/28/10 11:15 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
In Carl's defense, he's horribly busy with end-of-term teaching (which
always penalizes one's real work, namely research) and then has a
conference to deal with. When we deal with
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
This is what I was assuming when I wrote my initial response. It
seemed like a good idea for somebody to do, not an offer of somebody
wanting to make the change.
Now, I was wrong in jumping to that assumption and responding
accordingly. But it
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 08:31:11AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Graham et al,
From the header comments in IR:
-snip lots of good data-
And have you decided whether this should just go in the
@knownissues on that page, or should it be a separate section?
James, once we have an answer,
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 07:15:23PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
When we deal with open-source volunteer
projects while we have that much stress in our lives, we all get
short-tempered. I'm certain that you can think of examples from my
Talking about
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=673
problem with order of \consists
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Reviewing the situation, I'm not sure I *need* to send a patch: the Learning
[!!] page
17 matches
Mail list logo
