Re: "patch" for underline function

On 7/14/10 4:15 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:08:39PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: >> Kieren still lacks a git setup, though, and this very patch has only >> been mentioned on the -devel list and the bug tracker, so I guess it's a >> special case. > > ah, ok. I m

Re: "patch" for underline function

On 2010-07-14 12:34, Graham Percival wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:21:56PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: Or does this run in the virtual box under MacOS now? Lilybuntu is a virtual machine. It can be run in vmware or virtualbox on top of linux, windows, or macos. We've had two new docume

Re: "patch" for underline function

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:08:39PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: > Kieren still lacks a git setup, though, and this very patch has only > been mentioned on the -devel list and the bug tracker, so I guess it's a > special case. ah, ok. I missed that. > I can prepare a proper git patch and pos

Re: "patch" for underline function

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:21:56PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: > On 2010-07-14 12:15, Graham Percival wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:08:39PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: >>> Regarding your new entry in the tracker about how to comment: Rietveld >>> looks like the best option for reviews,

Re: "patch" for underline function

On 2010-07-14 12:15, Graham Percival wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:08:39PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: Regarding your new entry in the tracker about how to comment: Rietveld looks like the best option for reviews, but I dislike to force everybody to use it. I'm not sure how many develope

Re: "patch" for underline function

On 2010-07-14 10:42, Graham Percival wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:34:01AM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: @ Graham: W.r.t. , what's a non-developer supposed to do with his review? Post on -devel? Comment in the issue des

Re: "patch" for underline function

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:34:01AM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: > [This mail is essentially copied from > to have it on > -devel...] > > @ Graham: W.r.t. > , > w

Re: "patch" for underline function

On 2010-05-25 14:33, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi all, I want to have independent control of the thickness and offset of the underline markup function -- unfortunately, they are currently linked (i.e., the offset is a multiple of the thickness). [...] [This mail is essentially copied from

"patch" for underline function

Hi all, I want to have independent control of the thickness and offset of the underline markup function -- unfortunately, they are currently linked (i.e., the offset is a multiple of the thickness). I have taken what I found in define-markup-commands.scm and modified it as follows: %%%