Re: possibility of merging \override and \set (was: Naming, _another_ lacking puzzle piece)

On 10/14/2012 07:36 PM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote: Please, can we get away from thinking in terms of implementation details and instead think of the use cases: 1) Just set a property (grob or context property) to a certain value, don't worry about previous values 2) Set a property to

Re: possibility of merging \override and \set (was: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece)

Sorry, Reinhold - forgot to send to all.. On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > On 14/10/2012 17:46, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> As for (2), i see that there are three operations that can be >> performed on stack: push, pop and clear. > > Please, can we get away from thinking i

Re: possibility of merging \override and \set (was: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece)

On 14/10/2012 17:46, Janek Warchoł wrote: > As for (2), i see that there are three operations that can be > performed on stack: push, pop and clear. Please, can we get away from thinking in terms of implementation details and instead think of the use cases: 1) Just set a property (grob or contex

possibility of merging \override and \set (was: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece)

Hi, On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > Two years ago, David and I had a discussion about the existence of /tweak, > /set, and /override. > > > > Perhaps now David has put together enough infrastructure t