Re: reformatted GNUmakefile pushed to staging

2012-10-23 Thread David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG writes: >> out=test \ >> local-test >> /bin/sh: 1: local-test: not found >> make: *** [test] Error 127 > > Thanks, I'll upload a fixed patch with patchy. However, you are going > to remove some stuff from GNUmakefile, right? Then I'll wait. It would make sense to

Re: reformatted GNUmakefile pushed to staging

2012-10-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> out=test \ > local-test > /bin/sh: 1: local-test: not found > make: *** [test] Error 127 Thanks, I'll upload a fixed patch with patchy. However, you are going to remove some stuff from GNUmakefile, right? Then I'll wait. > I am backing this change out of staging again. Thank

Re: reformatted GNUmakefile pushed to staging

2012-10-23 Thread David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG writes: >> I have run my own copy of patchy-merge, and it failed because of >> typos in the Makefile, > > Details, please. I already sent the details previous to writing the quoted mail above, but looking at the list archives it would appear that Gmane swallowed them as Spam or TO

Re: reformatted GNUmakefile pushed to staging

2012-10-23 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > Werner LEMBERG writes: > >> Folks, >> >> >> as discussed some weeks ago, I've now pushed the reformatted >> GNUmakefile to staging. There are only whitespace changes. > > Is there anything wrong with our review system? If you feel there is, > how about at least posting

Re: reformatted GNUmakefile pushed to staging

2012-10-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I have run my own copy of patchy-merge, and it failed because of > typos in the Makefile, Details, please. Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: reformatted GNUmakefile pushed to staging

2012-10-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> as discussed some weeks ago, I've now pushed the reformatted >> GNUmakefile to staging. There are only whitespace changes. > > Is there anything wrong with our review system? If you feel there > is, how about at least posting the patch for review on the list > before pushing? It *has* been p

Re: reformatted GNUmakefile pushed to staging

2012-10-23 Thread David Kastrup
James writes: > Hello, > > On 23 October 2012 08:26, David Kastrup wrote: >> Werner LEMBERG writes: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> >>> as discussed some weeks ago, I've now pushed the reformatted >>> GNUmakefile to staging. There are only whitespace changes. >> >> Is there anything wrong with our revie

Re: reformatted GNUmakefile pushed to staging

2012-10-23 Thread James
Hello, On 23 October 2012 08:26, David Kastrup wrote: > Werner LEMBERG writes: > >> Folks, >> >> >> as discussed some weeks ago, I've now pushed the reformatted >> GNUmakefile to staging. There are only whitespace changes. > > Is there anything wrong with our review system? If you feel there i

Re: reformatted GNUmakefile pushed to staging

2012-10-23 Thread David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG writes: > Folks, > > > as discussed some weeks ago, I've now pushed the reformatted > GNUmakefile to staging. There are only whitespace changes. Is there anything wrong with our review system? If you feel there is, how about at least posting the patch for review on the list befo

reformatted GNUmakefile pushed to staging

2012-10-22 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Folks, as discussed some weeks ago, I've now pushed the reformatted GNUmakefile to staging. There are only whitespace changes. Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel