A bit late answer, sorry...
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:56:33AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> Graham&David, when i said that i'd like to make Patchy more
>> user-friendly i meant to make it so straightforward that these
>> questions wouldn'
- Original Message -
From: "James"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc: "David Kastrup" ;
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: regular patchy staging
Graham,
2012/3/3 Graham Percival :
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:56:33AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote
Graham,
2012/3/3 Graham Percival :
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:56:33AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:16 AM, James wrote:
>> > I still have some fundamental questions about the scripts.
>
> Have you read
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patchy
>
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:56:33AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:16 AM, James wrote:
> > I still have some fundamental questions about the scripts.
Have you read
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patchy
?
> Graham&David, when i said that i'd like to
Snip all and some updates.
For some background to patchy, see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patchy
FWIW, it's normally me that runs patchy-staging, not David. I know he does
run it when needed, but I have been running it generally twice a day for the
last few weeks
Hello,
On 3 March 2012 09:03, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
>> I'd saw that David and Graham and (i think) Phil and Janek (?) had
>> been running patchy so figured it was now covered
>
> There is staging-patchy. It does not require manual work, just
> processing power, but lots of that
James writes:
> I'd saw that David and Graham and (i think) Phil and Janek (?) had
> been running patchy so figured it was now covered
There is staging-patchy. It does not require manual work, just
processing power, but lots of that. It is not bothered if people run it
in parallel (the worst t
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:16 AM, James wrote:
> I am back from my break (and the internet connection is much better if
> still not great - tops out at 300kb/s which is ok) and have been going
> through the emails that had come in the last week or so, I'm just
> about caught up and have done a few d
Hello,
2012/3/2 Janek Warchoł :
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> Any advance on having a regular patchy staging compile? like,
>> every 6 hours or something?
>
> Currently it's David who is running Patchy (i am amazed by his
> invol
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> Any advance on having a regular patchy staging compile? like,
>> every 6 hours or something?
>
> Currently it's David who is running Patchy (i am amazed by his
> involvement),
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Any advance on having a regular patchy staging compile? like,
> every 6 hours or something?
Currently it's David who is running Patchy (i am amazed by his
involvement), and he lacks processing power to do this more often.
I t
Any advance on having a regular patchy staging compile? like,
every 6 hours or something?
Whenever I want to make a release, I just guess whenever somebody
has recently run patchy and fork release/unstable, knowing that
the fork will probably miss a few commits that were in staging.
Given the
12 matches
Mail list logo
