Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-29 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > I can add the I+J->IJ stuff for OpenType script `latn', language > > `NLDĀ ' (Dutch), if you want me to do that. Similarly, I can > > disable the f+i->fi stuff for languages `TRK ' (Turkish) and > > `PTGĀ ' (Portuguese) -- I'm not sure about the latter, however. > > I thought that the idea was

Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-29 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Werner LEMBERG escreveu: > Yep. The question is which kind of interface we should implement. > With `we' I mean `you', of course :-) My knowledge of the Pango > library is virtually nonexistent. > > I can add the I+J->IJ stuff for OpenType script `latn', language > `NLD ' (Dutch), if you want m

Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-28 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> >>> I+J -> IJ, i + j->ij > >>> > >>> I think those two should be removed also (just think of > >>> Strawinskij). > >> > >> No, those are language dependent (i + j -> ij is done in Dutch) > > > > Hmm. First of all, the default versions of the URW fonts don't > > have a ligature for that, only t

Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-17 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Werner LEMBERG escreveu: >>> Well, my tests have worked. BTW, there are other ligatures also: >>> >>> I+J -> IJ, i + j->ij >>> >>> I think those two should be removed also (just think of >>> Strawinskij). >> No, those are language dependent (i + j -> ij is done in Dutch) > > Hmm. First of all,

Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-16 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > Well, my tests have worked. BTW, there are other ligatures also: > > > > I+J -> IJ, i + j->ij > > > > I think those two should be removed also (just think of > > Strawinskij). > > No, those are language dependent (i + j -> ij is done in Dutch) Hmm. First of all, the default versions of th

Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-16 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Werner LEMBERG escreveu: >>> SelectIf("trademark", "trademark", "afii61352", "afii61352"); >>> RemoveATT("Ligature", "*", "*"); >>> >>> Generate($3 + $fontname + ".otf"); >> Are you sure it only removes ligatures for tm and No ? > > Well, my tests have worked. BTW, there are other ligatures also:

Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-15 Thread Juergen Reuter
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Werner LEMBERG wrote: I don't know, if this matters, but in ancient notation, there definitely is an "ij" ligature (as well as an "IJ" ligature) that is quite often used as a textual repetition directive in lyrics. I hope the according definitions at the very beginning of

Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I don't know, if this matters, but in ancient notation, there > definitely is an "ij" ligature (as well as an "IJ" ligature) that is > quite often used as a textual repetition directive in lyrics. I > hope the according definitions at the very beginning of > ly/gregorian-init.ly will still work

Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-15 Thread Juergen Reuter
I don't know, if this matters, but in ancient notation, there definitely is an "ij" ligature (as well as an "IJ" ligature) that is quite often used as a textual repetition directive in lyrics. I hope the according definitions at the very beginning of ly/gregorian-init.ly will still work and

Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Well, my tests have worked. BTW, there are other ligatures also: > > I+J -> IJ, i + j->ij > > I think those two should be removed also (just think of > Strawinskij). This is now in the git repository. Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing lis

Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > SelectIf("trademark", "trademark", "afii61352", "afii61352"); > > RemoveATT("Ligature", "*", "*"); > > > > Generate($3 + $fontname + ".otf"); > > Are you sure it only removes ligatures for tm and No ? Well, my tests have worked. BTW, there are other ligatures also: I+J -> IJ, i + j->ij I

Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-15 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Werner LEMBERG escreveu: > Han-Wen, > > > what about this simple script to replace pfx2ttf.fontforge? Is this > what you envision? > > > Werner > > > == > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ > > Open($1); > MergeKern($2) > > > # NC

replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge

2006-12-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Han-Wen, what about this simple script to replace pfx2ttf.fontforge? Is this what you envision? Werner == [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ Open($1); MergeKern($2) # NCSB is broken as shipped by Fedora Core 6: # It contains bogus