Re: stale git branches

2020-04-14 Thread David Kastrup
Jonas Hahnfeld writes: > Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 15:33 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Jonas Hahnfeld writes: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look >> > at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped >> > branches

Re: stale git branches

2020-04-14 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld
Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 15:33 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup: > Jonas Hahnfeld writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look > > at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped > > branches (outside of dev/user/) to a

Re: stale git branches

2020-04-11 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld
Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 14:48 +0200 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 2:13 PM Jonas Hahnfeld < > hah...@hahnjo.de > > wrote: > > following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look > > at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped > >

Re: stale git branches

2020-04-11 Thread Urs Liska
Am 11. April 2020 15:33:06 MESZ schrieb David Kastrup : >Jonas Hahnfeld writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look >> at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped >> branches (outside of dev/user/) to a minimum. This

Re: stale git branches

2020-04-11 Thread David Kastrup
Jonas Hahnfeld writes: > Hi all, > > following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look > at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped > branches (outside of dev/user/) to a minimum. This should also avoid > overlooking old changes that have not been merged

Re: stale git branches

2020-04-11 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 2:13 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look > at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped > branches (outside of dev/user/) to a minimum. This should also avoid > overlooking old changes that

stale git branches

2020-04-11 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld
Hi all, following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped branches (outside of dev/user/) to a minimum. This should also avoid overlooking old changes that have not been merged yet. The following list is by no