Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 15:33 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look
>> > at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped
>> > branches
Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 15:33 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look
> > at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped
> > branches (outside of dev/user/) to a
Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 14:48 +0200 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 2:13 PM Jonas Hahnfeld <
> hah...@hahnjo.de
> > wrote:
> > following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look
> > at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped
> >
Am 11. April 2020 15:33:06 MESZ schrieb David Kastrup :
>Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look
>> at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped
>> branches (outside of dev/user/) to a minimum. This
Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> Hi all,
>
> following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look
> at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped
> branches (outside of dev/user/) to a minimum. This should also avoid
> overlooking old changes that have not been merged
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 2:13 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look
> at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped
> branches (outside of dev/user/) to a minimum. This should also avoid
> overlooking old changes that
Hi all,
following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look
at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped
branches (outside of dev/user/) to a minimum. This should also avoid
overlooking old changes that have not been merged yet.
The following list is by no