Hi all,
2013/4/5 Janek Warchoł
> Hi,
>
> The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it doesn't show that
> this grob is related to the clef, and anyway the clef can be
> "transposed" by any amount, not just an octave.
> I suggest to rename this grob to ClefTransposition or something
> si
2013/4/8 pls :
> On 08.04.2013, at 10:58, pls wrote:
>
>> On 08.04.2013, at 09:56, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Actually, it's not just the clef where I am without a clue how to play
>>> this, or on what instrument…
>> Is this piece supposed to be played on a baritone guitar (tuned a perfect
>> fif
On 08.04.2013, at 10:58, pls wrote:
> On 08.04.2013, at 09:56, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> 2013/4/7 David Kastrup :
>>>
A digital camera does not produce even lighting, but for simple
demonstrations it is better than nothing.
>>>
>>> I don't have a digit
On 08.04.2013, at 09:56, David Kastrup wrote:
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> 2013/4/7 David Kastrup :
>>
>>> A digital camera does not produce even lighting, but for simple
>>> demonstrations it is better than nothing.
>>
>> I don't have a digital camera, too.
>> Though, my girl friends mobile
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2013/4/7 David Kastrup :
>
>> A digital camera does not produce even lighting, but for simple
>> demonstrations it is better than nothing.
>
> I don't have a digital camera, too.
> Though, my girl friends mobile phone camera worked.
Actually, it's not just the clef where
- Original Message -
From: "Werner LEMBERG"
To: "janek lilypond"
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2013 4:07:35 AM
Subject: Re: suggestion: change OctavateEight name to ClefTransposition -
opinions?
> My friend suggests ClefPitchModi
> My friend suggests ClefPitchModifier - what'd you think?
Sounds good.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "pls"
Cc: "LilyPond Developmet Team"
Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2013 9:47:52 PM
Subject: Re: suggestion: change OctavateEight name to ClefTransposition -
opinions?
2013/4/7 pls :
>
>> I thin
2013/4/7 pls :
>
>> I think I'd like ClefModifier.
>
> I'd prefer ClefOctavation (or maybe ClefOctaveShift) to ClefModifier
> because it's clearer / more intuitive (at least to me). ClefModifier
> could be misunderstood to refer to the shape of the symbol.
In a way it is altering the symbol - by
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2013/4/7 Ian Hulin :
>
>> The only numbers that make sense above or below clefs are ones
>> referring to a whole number of octaves (8, 15 etc.)
>
> I know at least one piece using a \clef "G_5"
>
> "Chiton"
> Uroš Roijko
> Verlag Neue Musik, Berlin
> NM 852
>
> It's a piec
2013/4/7 Ian Hulin :
> The only numbers that make sense above or below clefs are ones
> referring to a whole number of octaves (8, 15 etc.)
I know at least one piece using a \clef "G_5"
"Chiton"
Uroš Roijko
Verlag Neue Musik, Berlin
NM 852
It's a piece for Solo-Guitar using a three staves layo
2013/4/7 Ian Hulin :
>
>> I'd prefer ClefOctavation (or maybe ClefOctaveShift) to
>> ClefModifier because it's clearer / more intuitive (at least to
>> me). ClefModifier could be misunderstood to refer to the shape of
>> the symbol.
>
> 1+
> The only numbers that make sense above or below clefs ar
Hi All
On 07/04/13 10:00, pls wrote:
>
> Am 07.04.2013 um 10:14 schrieb Marc Hohl :
>
>> Am 06.04.2013 23:44, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Marc Hohl writes:
>>>
Am 05.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> Hi,
>
> The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it
> doesn
pls writes:
> Am 07.04.2013 um 10:14 schrieb Marc Hohl :
>
>> Am 06.04.2013 23:44, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Marc Hohl writes:
>>>
Am 05.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> Hi,
>
> The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it doesn't show that
> this grob is r
Am 07.04.2013 um 10:14 schrieb Marc Hohl :
> Am 06.04.2013 23:44, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Marc Hohl writes:
>>
>>> Am 05.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it doesn't show that
this grob is related to the clef, and
Am 06.04.2013 23:44, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl writes:
Am 05.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it doesn't show that
this grob is related to the clef, and anyway the clef can be
"transposed" by any amount, not just an octave.
I
Hi,
2013/4/6 David Kastrup :
> Marc Hohl writes:
>> I'd prefer ClefTransposition over ClefShift, since the latter
>> implies some shift relative to the clef's default position.
>
> I think I'd like ClefModifier. Something like
>
> `clefOctavation' (integer)
> Add this much extra oc
David Kastrup wrote Saturday, April 06, 2013 10:44 PM
> I think I'd like ClefModifier. Something like
+1
Trevor
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Marc Hohl writes:
> Am 05.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it doesn't show that
>> this grob is related to the clef, and anyway the clef can be
>> "transposed" by any amount, not just an octave.
>> I suggest to rename this grob t
Just a thought:
LilyPond allows for any number, not just "8," so doesn't ClefTransposition
actually make more sense?
-David
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Hohl"
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2013 6:35:56 AM
Subject: Re: suggestion: cha
Am 05.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it doesn't show that
this grob is related to the clef, and anyway the clef can be
"transposed" by any amount, not just an octave.
I suggest to rename this grob to ClefTransposition or something
simi
Hi,
The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it doesn't show that
this grob is related to the clef, and anyway the clef can be
"transposed" by any amount, not just an octave.
I suggest to rename this grob to ClefTransposition or something
similar (since this is not strictly transposition,
22 matches
Mail list logo
