On 14-Sep-04, at 6:05 AM, Karl Berry wrote:
I very much doubt it. More likely is that your MacOSX system only
allows a certain number of open files in the system overall, or
per-process. Googling for macosx "too many open files" turns up many
possibilities.
Thanks, I found the solution. (I'd b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is there any nice way to fix this so that it doesn't produce a warning
> in
> this case?
No, not that I know.
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
On 10-Sep-04, at 6:04 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Also, due to the large number of warnings (most of which are caused by
the ancient notation code, incidentally), it is rather unconvenient to
use the warnings of a make web run for checking correctness.
That's one thing I'll be working on fixing. N
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > AFAICS Graham is talking about the http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/ website,
> > > which has been broken for a week or longer, starting at section 5.8.6.
> > > Hence, you have already reproduced the problem. ;-)
> >
> > No, this is unrelated, and I've just refreshed t
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >
> >
> > AFAICS Graham is talking about the http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/ website,
> > which has been broken for a week or longer, starting at section 5.8.6.
> > Hence, you have already reproduced the problem. ;-)
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
>
> AFAICS Graham is talking about the http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/ website,
> which has been broken for a week or longer, starting at section 5.8.6.
> Hence, you have already reproduced the problem. ;-)
No, this is unrelated, and I've just refreshed the site with
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > In release 2.3.14, lilypond output is broken for 5.8.6 and higher
> > numbers. 5.8.5 and
> > below works.
> > I can't see anything special about 5.8.5 that would break the build,
> > but this may just
> > be a symp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> This might be something particular to OSX (maybe the fink texinfo
> package only allows you to have 128 nodes, or something). Can somebody
> on Linux reproduce this problem? Can anybody fix it? :)
Can you send this problem to the bug-texinfo list at gnu.org?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In release 2.3.14, lilypond output is broken for 5.8.6 and higher
> numbers. 5.8.5 and
> below works.
> I can't see anything special about 5.8.5 that would break the build,
> but this may just
> be a symptom of a larger problem. Here's 5.8.6:
> http://www.lilypond.
On 9-Sep-04, at 1:26 PM, Juergen Reuter wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Graham Percival wrote:
(IMO we should have a
subsection under "polyphony", even if that's the only subsection in
that section),
Why not moving "polyphony" behind 5.1.5 ("chords")? Entering chords as
described in 5.1.5 means enterin
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Graham Percival wrote:
> ...
> (IMO we should have a
> subsection under "polyphony", even if that's the only subsection in
> that section),
> ...
Why not moving "polyphony" behind 5.1.5 ("chords")? Entering chords as
described in 5.1.5 means entering multiple voices in
In release 2.3.14, lilypond output is broken for 5.8.6 and higher
numbers. 5.8.5 and
below works.
I can't see anything special about 5.8.5 that would break the build,
but this may just
be a symptom of a larger problem. Here's 5.8.6:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/
12 matches
Mail list logo
