>> I think (2) might be the route to go. Comments?
>
> semi-related: what about the Y dimension (depth?). For accidentals,
> the glyph is centered on the center of the notehead, but for
> integrating with text, it should typically be centered on 0.5ex ?
Something like this, yes. I will soon s
> While playing around with accidentals, I compared Bravura's glyph
> metrics with the ones from Emmentaler. In short: Bravura looks like
> a 'normal' font, while Emmentaler is non-standard.
Meanwhile I came to the conclusion that this doesn't matter because...
> With 'normal' I mean that if yo
>> (2) The same as (1), but make LilyPond undo the font changes
>> internally, that is, it horizontally translates a glyph's
>> outline back to the position specified by the Lisp tables (if
>> the glyph is in the tables). This ensures both consistency and
>> backwards compatibili
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:26 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
...
>
> I think (2) might be the route to go. Comments?
semi-related: what about the Y dimension (depth?). For accidentals,
the glyph is centered on the center of the notehead, but for
integrating with text, it should typically be centered o
Am Montag, dem 22.11.2021 um 09:25 + schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> (2) The same as (1), but make LilyPond undo the font changes
> internally, that is, it horizontally translates a glyph's outline
> back to the position specified by the Lisp tables (if the glyph
> is
> in the tables). T
While playing around with accidentals, I compared Bravura's glyph
metrics with the ones from Emmentaler. In short: Bravura looks like a
'normal' font, while Emmentaler is non-standard.
With 'normal' I mean that if you mix Bravura glyphs with other text,
they behave as expected, that is, the curr
