2011/2/24 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
See differences in output between original patch (variant 1):
http://www.sendspace.com/file/d8jk3o
and new patch: http://www.sendspace.com/file/tgmlfc
Proof-sheet source code in attachment.
Ooops, i forgot the attachment...
Here it
Hi,
2011/2/22 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
I'll cook appropriate function tomorrow.
Thanks,
Janek
I'm very sorry for the delay, i had some trouble with git.
I've uploaded new patch for review, it supports custom stem lengths
and staves with custom line count.
See
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:08:05PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2011/2/20 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
This change is default over current lily, so let's put it in. I can't
this change is an improvement over current lily
It took me a lng time see any difference between the
2011/2/21 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
Can you make your code be less hardcoded? I propose something like:
factor = (1+abs(hp[dir])) / (2*staff_radius + 1)
shorten *= min(factor, 1.0)
What staff_radius is? I tried to find an explanation, but to no avail...
this way, it will work
2011/2/21 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
2011/2/21 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
Can you make your code be less hardcoded? I propose something like:
factor = (1+abs(hp[dir])) / (2*staff_radius + 1)
shorten *= min(factor, 1.0)
What staff_radius is? I tried to find
2011/2/21 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
2011/2/21 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
2011/2/21 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
Can you make your code be less hardcoded? I propose something like:
factor = (1+abs(hp[dir])) / (2*staff_radius + 1)
shorten *= min(factor,
On 2/13/11, Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first part of a series of changes to the stems and flags.
The suggested change is small, but in my opinion important.
Thanks you for creating such an excellent report on the matter. You
took the time to create two
2011/2/13 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
This is the first part of a series of changes to the stems and flags.
The suggested change is small, but in my opinion important.
Look at the attached transition testing.pdf - it illustrates the problem:
the 'b' stem is definately too
2011/2/20 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
This change is default over current lily, so let's put it in. I can't
this change is an improvement over current lily
[time to go to bed, I guess]
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Hi,
This is the first part of a series of changes to the stems and flags.
The suggested change is small, but in my opinion important.
Look at the attached transition testing.pdf - it illustrates the problem:
the 'b' stem is definately too short (it should not end at the same level as
the stem of
First one has the advantage of being very simple, while the second
may be more smooth to the eye (but the difference isn't really that
big).
I prefer the first solution but I don't cast my mind in stone :-)
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing
11 matches
Mail list logo
