On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:37:59PM +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
>> Five rounds of guesswork from several developers for a single sentence
>> would not seem like the most efficient use of manpower for proceeding on
>> this item.
>
> Agreed; j
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:37:59PM +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
> Five rounds of guesswork from several developers for a single sentence
> would not seem like the most efficient use of manpower for proceeding on
> this item.
Agreed; just go ahead and push whatever you have right now.
Regardless of w
On 2012/05/21 18:22:45, janek wrote:
New version.
On 2012/05/21 17:51:11, Graham Percival wrote:
> I hate to be a mao, but I believe I suggested a new news item?
I thought that it was a non-obligatory suggestion.
> Think of each news item as a tweet or something like that.
> We have a ne
Reviewers: dak, Graham Percival,
Message:
New version.
On 2012/05/21 17:51:11, Graham Percival wrote:
I hate to be a mao, but I believe I suggested a new news item?
I thought that it was a non-obligatory suggestion.
Think of each news item as a tweet or something like that.
We have a new pi
I hate to be a mao, but I believe I suggested a new news item? Think of
each news item as a tweet or something like that. We have a new piece
of news: the release candidate has been cancelled.
In other news, Prague has really bumpy trams. (proof by induction with
a sample size of 1)
http://co
http://codereview.appspot.com/6223054/diff/1/Documentation/web/news-front.itexi
File Documentation/web/news-front.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6223054/diff/1/Documentation/web/news-front.itexi#newcode21
Documentation/web/news-front.itexi:21: @strong{Update (@emph{May 12,
2012)}:}
