- Original Message -
From:
To: "Phil Holmes"
> My wife said that everyone looks like geeks. There are 3 exceptions.
You can't leave us hanging like that!! I hope I wasn't in the
exceptions!!!
Cheers,
MS
No. 2 were 4-legged and one was
t, rather than a
change we've made.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
?
When i buy a new laptop it's possible that my desktop will be
available for some work. IIRC i have a fixed IP, and not-too-bad
bandwidth (0.5 or 1 Mbit/s upload). The only issue is that it will
never be available 24/7 - more like several hours each day.
cheers,
Janek
James and I will hav
it - I couldn't get it running on 64 bit, so I'm using a VM
with a 32 bit OS - in fact, it's a lilydev machine.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "James" ; "Janek Warchoł" ;
"LilyPond Developmet Team"
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: successful GUB build on my LilyDev (2.6)
Phil Holmes
r lilypond-2.17.1-1.freebsd-64.sh
test result does not exist for lilypond-2.17.1-1.mingw.exe
chgrp -R lilypond uploads/lilypond*
chgrp: invalid group: `lilypond'
Any ideas?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https:
- Original Message -
From: "John Mandereau"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" ; "LilyPond Developmet Team"
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: successful GUB build on my LilyDev (2.6)
2012/8/28 Phil Holmes :
Ye
n't know what the problem was, but I ran test-patchy-staging to find out,
and all was well. As of now, master==staging.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: GUB upload error
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 03:43:40PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
gub@gub-virtualbox:~/gub$ make lilypond-
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: GUB upload error
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:16:18AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
For reference, I added the new group and a
al regtest comparison is against 2.15.38, because of the
vagaries of my initial GUB build. This is spectacularly useless I'll
look at the regtests with my pixel comparator as soon as the upload of
2.17.1 has completed (so far, 4 hours and counting...)
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Regtests
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 01:0
uming that this is because GUB is trying to log in as you to the git
repo and failing, because it has my key? a) is that right? b) should I
find the gpercival@git bit and change this to my git username and c) what
does this command do?
--
P
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: Gub upload failure
"Phil Holmes" writes:
OK - so it looks like I've now rsynched a few 100 MB of updates. I
get this failure:
git --git-dir downloads/
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: Gub upload failure
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Wednesday,
stem-length-estimation.ps'...
+ warning: cannot fit music on page: overflow is 8.901118
- Converting to PNG...
+ warning: compressing music to fit
- Success: compilation successfully completed
+ Layout output to `stem-length-estimation.ps'...
-
+ Converting to PNG...
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: 2.17.1 regtests
Thanks Phil!
The regtest that worries me most is les-nereides.ly.
There is a comment starting on line 827 of axis-group-engraver.c
Can I just say that this is the first release I've build and uploaded?
Fingers crossed.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ot; which have to be changed to "Fixed_2_17_2" since they
missed the proper time to actually make it into 2.17.1.
--
David Kastrup
This implies that I should update VERSION soon after I start a GUB run.
@John/GP - is that correct?
--
Phil Holmes
At any rate, I had not admitted the problematic change into 2.16.0, so
while we certainly do need 2.16.1 in due time, it is not because of this
issue.
I deleted it as soon as I realised it was wrong...
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-
ppspot.com/6344092/
This patch has been approved, pushed and the Rietveld closed. If you want
to propose changes, it should be a new patch.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
/make doc/make test
with this change and would like to push directly to staging - given that it
was John's suggestion, he knows what he's talking about, and it works and
it's a further step in reducing the cruft from make doc.
Any objections?
--
Phil Holmes
ually does anything, or merely
echoes information to the terminal. Could a make-guru explain, and propose
an alternative syntax which does the same thing without the terminal output?
TIA
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu
sure I'd tested it
with make doc, but must have omitted it with this one. Is the best option
to revert the commit in staging, or is there a better way?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ;
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2012 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: Reduce output from scripts during make doc (issue 6499068)
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 04:54:47PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Unfortunately
that the snippet actually only works
properly on 2.16. Using the LSR and on my own machine with 2.14 I get no
numerals over the normal staff, and little zeros on the tabstaff. If you
know how to fix that, please let me know.
--
Phil Holmes
___
number of jobs, it puts the output into some logfiles
something like multirun-0.log. If you cab find those, multirun-5 should
help.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I was wondering if
someone knew where the logfiles for these things were stashed so I can see
how they're failing?
Cheers,
MS
Is this with make test?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.o
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ;
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: Regtest checking
> Is this with make test?
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
No, make check.
Should I be using make test?
Cheers,
MS
Depends what you're
(and does fix (why don't we have les-nereides.ly
in the regtest comparison?))).
AFAIK, we do. It's just that the mechanism used to "test" the regtests is
not guaranteed to find all changes :-(
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypon
/
Looks closed to me.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
e, unless there are screams of pain - the next release (2.17.2) will
be next Sunday, the 16th (or will possibly start on the 15th).
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
here is no vertical symmetry in hand-drawn 15C clefs, so
there is no point it trying to recreate it in 21C machine drawn clefs.
Whoever created the original clef made it arbitrarily symmetrical, with no
justification, so changing this needs no other justification.
--
P
t an artifact of
your first MF tries? Then fix it :-)
OK. OK. Just to be sure. You want me to fix it :-)
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
a chat without me. The previous "scheduled chat" only
had 2 participants from -devel (plus two people already in the irc
channel), so it's certainly worth rescheduling the time if we
could get 3 participants.
- Graham
That's a rehearsal night for me. Then again, so is M
get them installed there
correctly...
Thanks so much,
David
I suspect this might be relevant:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2742
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
efore continuing."
I'm 99.9% sure I'm correct here, but just to be _really_ sure. This doesn't
have to be on the GUB machine, right? It can be any machine with push
ability, because GUB will pull the changed files before doing the build. If
this is true, OK if I update
- Original Message -
From: "John Mandereau"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
Il giorno lun, 10/09/2012 alle 15.08 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
On
http://lilypond.org/doc/v
- Original Message -
From: "John Mandereau"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
Il giorno lun, 10/09/2012 alle 16.12 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
Thanks, John. I'm follo
the best bet is to kick GUB off from a clean state:
rm -rf uploads
rm -rf target
And try again? If so, I'll probably re-run GUB when I'm rehearsing tomorrow
and push the upload overnight.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing li
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Devel"
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
Yes. Did you get your repository with
git clone
? if so, you sho
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Devel"
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:05 AM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:54:05PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
I gu
extra voice and spacer rests, but it's not
too clever.
As mentioned by me earlier in the week, it makes automatically generating
code a bit odd, too, since you need to store the post events up until you've
written the note.
--
Phil Holmes
__
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands
"Phil Holmes" writes:
I've always thought that the post-event nature of lilypond is its own
worst
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Devel"
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:01:28PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Hm
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.17.2. This
release contains the usual number of bugfixes. It is strongly
recommended that normal users do not use this release, and instead
use the stable 2.16 version.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond
nge on this mailing list. If it's really contraversial,
running a review would be advisable.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Results from my pixel comparator. Some good, some in need of consideration:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.2/
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: 2.17.2 regtests
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
Results from my pixel comparator. Some good, some in need of
consideration:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/r
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To: ; "Phil Holmes"
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 3:14 AM
Subject: Re: 2.17.2 regtests
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:59:25 -0700, Phil Holmes
wrote:
From: "Keith OHara"
These changes are expected and expla
this and
if it's OK supply a patch?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
lated patch sets. Can anyone confirm
this behavior?
Cheers,
Which patch sets, what changes?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ding error messages when an override has no effect because it was
at the voice context and should have been at staff?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint
"Phil Holmes" writes:
And getting rid of case-sensitivity in a lot of this?
You need to elaborate. It is not clear wha
Could you state your reasoning, please? I've
already stated mine.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ainly use it as a
way to direct development - "hey, David, when you're working on the parser,
could you also work towards making it case insensitive?". But if we are
abused for making suggestions that would make life easier for users, as
opposed to developers, then we should agree to st
I won't be pushing 2823 at this point - we've agreed that the clef needs
changing completely. I have a copy of the metafont book being delivered ....
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Colin Campbell
To: Devel
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:59 AM
Subj
ing the markup) and tried then successfully to
build snippets.pdf and snippets.html.
Both files are showing no problem with it.
So I hesitate to insert \markup \vspace #1
Any idea whats happening in the LSR?
-Harm
I suspect you'll get a lot of silence, since none o
is as a
method, or is it just an alternative that's perfectly OK?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
that you don't want me to delete.
(See Chapter 27 of The METAFONTbook for an example.)
=====
Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
the build log?
--
David Kastrup
As James says:
Error trapped by lilypond-book
Please see
/build/buildd/lilypond-2.16.0/out/lybook-db/snippet-names--4642696709202227756.logTo
debug it, we need access to that logfile.--Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 5:18 AM
Subject: Re: Apparently the amd64 build of LilyPond 2.16.0 failed on Ubuntu
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent
:
syntax error, unexpected identifier
make[1]: *** [out/parser.hh] Error 1
I'll have another go once this is fixed.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: GUB failure in parser.yy
"Phil Holmes" writes:
I'm trying to build 2.17.3. I get this failure:
mak
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: GUB failure in parser.yy
"Phil Holmes" writes:
My preference _right now_ would be to remove the code that'
ed build, it will be uploaded tonight and
then the website updated tomorrow morning. Uploading it during the day
kills my internet access.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: GUB commands not running
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:55:51AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
but if someone who is familiar wit
setting baseMoment and figuring out measureLength): that way
the chance for users to mess up once they have LilyPond stop complaining
is minimized.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ming { 8 [ 8 8 8 ] 8 [ 8 8 8 8 8 ] }
\beaming { 8 [ 8 8 8 ] 8 [ 8 8 8 ] }
which would set the beam patterns for both the current time signatures.
--
Phil Holmes
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.
with `penposX', you should use `penlabels(..., X,
...)', otherwise use `labels', but not both at the same time.
Thanks
http://codereview.appspot.com/6503091/
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
htt
ter, and easier to read.
Didn't think of this as an option. The benefit of quartercurve is that it
takes the place of 2 points, so is actually shorter. I'd like to stick with
what I now have, but will remember this for the future.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6503091/
--
Phil Hol
ing prints
to the command line for extents (both X and Y).
I've no idea if this will help, so feel free to ignore it. However, my
recollection is that running lily with -ddump-signatures gives information
on extents in the output file?
--
Phil Holmes
_
_
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
They should be the most recent of the logfiles,
and so one should show the error.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ;
; ; ;
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)
I would also place the vertical "center"
of the box level with "top dip
says:
[snip]
Did you look for lilypond-multi-run*.log, like I suggested?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ily-1ce78b89-systems.count...
Writing timing to b4/lily-1ce78b89.profile...Processing b4/lily-1ce78b89
Compiling utf-8.ly with the patch works without problems.
A brute force method is to find the most recent log file ...
--
Phil Holmes
___
lily
I'm always a little nervous about simply deleting staging, although I know
this is the correct approach. David - could you give me the commands needed
to delete and recreate staging, please? (Private mail if you don't want
everyone to try this out).
Thanks a
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ;
; ; ;
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
This is clear, but I've had
- Original Message -
From: "James"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ;
; ;
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)
On 28 September 2012 15:12, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Janek W
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "James" ; ; ;
; ;
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)
Hmm.
My answer to "how would we place the glyph at the c
0) (0 . 0))
\shape Slur
#'((-0.5 . 1.5) (-3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
Interpreting music...
[snip]
fatal error: failed files: "61/lily-1564b6f0.ly"
I presume 220f439edbd95266113248a984ebe6c4b97dcf14 is the culprit.
--
Phil Holmes
___
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: Patchy email from PhilH
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Cc:
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:11 PM
Subject: Patchy email
o master
(introduced in commit 054d8101e7bcd54bc8db40092b617bb8b2220b84), please
update.
I am. Willdo.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I'm currently building 2.17.4 and plan to upload it tonight and have it
available tomorrow. Please use 2.17.5 for claiming fixes on the issues list
from now.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
uite is relevant to documentation. But
I'm sorry if I've overlooked something here.
Unfortunately, testing that docs compile cleanly takes about 15 times as
long as code, so it's not for the underpowered or faint hearted. Used to be
2 3/4 hours on my virtual machine.
--
Phil
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Rushton Wakeling"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "James" ;
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [talk] why it'd be great to have web interface for
submittingsimple doc patches
On 10/06/2012 05:21 P
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Rushton Wakeling"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "James" ;
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [talk] why it'd be great to have web interface for
submittingsimple doc patches
On 10/06/2012 05:4
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond 2.17.4 released
Janek Warchoł writes:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 12:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
"Phil Holmes" writes:
We are happy to announce the
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond 2.17.4 released
"Phil Holmes" writes:
"it is strongly recommended that only experienced users try working w
w where do we record it for
the sake of the next release announcement?
In my brain. Unless I have a fade, I'll use this.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
th 17.2 there's a
visible hyphen in in-nocent, and this disappears with 17.4.
--
Phil Holmes
<>___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: 2.17.4 regtests
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
The one I don't understand is markup-special-characters.ly. I've
attached the difference image, but t
meone with
unix/python skills look at the issue and propose a solution? Until that
happens, I don't see there being any new lilypond releases.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailma
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 1:59 AM
Subject: Re: GUB broken
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 09:11:27AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Please see http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues
e to make it official: I'm stepping down as
project manager.
That's a real blow. You've made an immense contribution to
LilyPond over the years. It won't be the same without you!
+1
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing li
ther implication of \override being pop-push would seem to be that if
you do something like (pseudo code):
{\override Flag style = mensural c8 c c c \override Flag color = red c c c
c}
Then you'd revert the mensural style when you change the color? That would
be wholly unexpected to me.
I now have GUB running again - thanks to Julien I have renamed logging.py in
GUB to gub_log.py and it now builds all the required files. This note is to
record that fact, and to add documentation to my recent push to the GUB git
repo.
--
Phil Holmes
hange a snippet in the snippets directory - when I run makelsr, any other
changes will be obliterated.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
nuts. I'm not over-happy with oneMoment. I actually think
/once works well. As for /tweak: I think tweak is better than oneGrob, and
can't think of an improvement at this time.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
401 - 500 of 2094 matches
Mail list logo
