[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 02:53:19 +0200
J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand that you have fast plans to release the next
stable version, Dr. Han-Wen Mr. Nieuwenhuizen, I'm wondering
if I am allowed to do a round of complaining (all in good fun
of course) on
After checking more carefully I see a number of measures are missing.
Here is the complete song, Help please.
Thanks,
Aaron
blanknotes = {
\property Voice.NoteHead \override
#'transparent = ##t
\property Voice.Stem \override
#'transparent = ##t
}
unblanknotes = {\property
Hi Aaron,
the answer is easy:
%5 a'4 b'4 a'4 |
The percent sign introduces a comment. Anything from the percent sign to the
end of the line is ignored.
If you want to mark up the bar numbers in your input, do it the reverse way
around:
a'4 b' a' | %5
that works.
All the
HWN Also, keep in mind that we're freezing 1.8, so I will try to ignore
HWN any feature requests that also weren't working in 1.6. The idea is
HWN that we can release 1.8 when the doco is complete, and it doesn't any
HWN bugs relative to 1.6.
It's just that I've been using Lilypond quite
Title: Eservis.gen.tr Sanal reklam Merkezi , E-mail List
Kendi
Reklamnz Kendiniz Yapn!
Dk
maliyet ve snrsz kullanm...
KONTROLÜ
ELNZE ALIN..!
E-mail
gönderemiyorum problemlerine son! Hazrlam
Thanks I am just not sure where to tell lilypond to use babel or ivritex
etc.
When I add it to the start of the lyrics
with a doubled backslash as per lilypond I get the command in english in
the resulting dvi or ps.
\\hebalef
under the staff.
I was told to double the \\ and quote the foriegn
---BeginMessage---
Currently the default behavior for \key is to put the key
change before the barline. I'm quite sure however that the
correct notation is to have the key change after the
barline.
Yes, I know I can shift the barline and the key signature.
But shouldn't the default behavior be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, everybody.
Han-Wen was defending his doctoral thesis earlier today, so maybe that from
now on, we should take the habit of using `Dr.' when addressing him! :-)
That's only for the people that used to call me ir. Nienhuys (they may
now call me dr. ir. Nienhuys)
Aha! I thought I had tried that, but I had not explicitly specified the
voice context for the individual parts... so I added that and it is much
better now. Thanks, Jeremy!
One thing I do notice is that I get multiple dynamic markings on the
staff with the combined voices. But since
NP One thing I do notice is that I get multiple dynamic markings on the
NP staff with the combined voices. But since I'm the only one who will see
NP the score, I can live with that.
Would you care to send the .ly source file as an attachment to this
list?
Jeremy
Le 06/21/03 05:38, Niki Pantelias a écrit :
One thing I do notice is that I get multiple dynamic markings on the
staff with the combined voices. But since I'm the only one who will see
the score, I can live with that.
This is a problem for me. We can save a lot of space on the full score
FB This is a problem for me. We can save a lot of space on the full score
FB (for the conductor) when combining parts but there should be an option
FB to write only once dynamic that should appear exactly at the same place.
FB Otherwise, they are written one over the other slightly shifted.
12 matches
Mail list logo