Hi,
does nobody want to make a package for Suse Linux?
Thanks!
Peter
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello, Graham:
Does it look very bad to you?
Yes, I find it stands out as looking "sloppy".
Here's an example of what I think it *should* look like (untweaked as
engraved by Igor Engraver v1.7):
<>
Note how the top and bottom accidentals align (without touching), and
how much "cleaner" the re
What operating system are you using and how did you install lilypond?
If you are on Windows, try to rerun setup.exe and add the tetex-base
package from the Publishing section. Since this package is so large,
there's a tetex-tiny package that contains a minimal TeX installation
which is installed b
Hi everyone,
Is there a simple way to get a page break and complete new titling at the
start of each new \score block within a single file?
I've tried putting a new complete \header block within each \score block,
since I've seen several emails on the list archives that seem to imply tha
Some more details!
Ray Brohinsky wrote:
The easy production of .pdf files is very attractive, btw. I wonder if
I've missed a control for the dpi of the output of .pdf's? or if that's
been added in 2.0?
If you use ly2dvi -p (in version 1.8 or simply 'lilypon' in version
2.0), you will get scalable
> > Twinkle twinkle as
> > a4 a e e fis fis e2 d4 d cis cis b b a2
> > instead of (current relative mode):
> > a4 a e' e fis fis e2 d4 d cis cis b b a2
> > or (current absolute mode):
> > a,4 a, e e fis fis e2 d4 d cis cis b, b, a2,
> >
> > /Mats
>
> That can't be done already? You can't write
On Sunday 26 October 2003 10:18 am, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> You can do exactly what David suggests in version 2.0
> using the following syntax:
>
> \octave a,, a b c d e \octave a,, a b c d e
>
> see
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Octa
>ve-check.html Note that th
On Sunday 26 October 2003 01:18 am, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:24:00 +0200
>
> Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tried the \transpose c c' and feel that I am missing something.
> >
> > a c major scale c d e f g a b c should not force any octave jumps
> > if you think about
On Sunday 26 October 2003 07:49 am, Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote:
> Hello, Graham:
> > Does it look very bad to you?
>
> Yes, I find it stands out as looking "sloppy".
>
> Here's an example of what I think it *should* look like (untweaked as
> engraved by Igor Engraver v1.7):
I thought chromatic
You can do exactly what David suggests in version 2.0
using the following syntax:
\octave a,, a b c d e \octave a,, a b c d e
see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Octave-check.html
Note that the \octave command both provides a warning and corrects
the octave of the
However, you are certainly not alone, since a new octave check
feature was added in version 2.0 of LilyPond, see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Octave-check.html
It's nice, but it's only a control feature. I thought more of some kind
of making entry more explic
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I send a copy of this to bug-lilypond since it's a feature request.
As you have noted, you will only get a new indication of piece and opus
for each subsequent \score. I agree with you that it would be great to
have some option to automatically print a number of individual p
I send a copy of this to bug-lilypond since it's a feature request.
As you have noted, you will only get a new indication of piece and opus
for each subsequent \score. I agree with you that it would be great to
have some option to automatically print a number of individual parts
from a single inpu
13 matches
Mail list logo
