Re: Simple tie question

2004-01-22 Thread t . scharkowski
Thanks to all who answered. I promise to read the manual more thoroughly! :-) But I still don't understand why ex1 works!? Thomas Hello, why does the 2nd example not work? ex1: -- \score { \notes { c' c' c' e' g' ~ c' e' g' } } \paper {} -- ex2: -- \score { \notes

Re: Simple tie question

2004-01-22 Thread Mats Bengtsson
If you don't explicitly write out the duration of a note, it gets the same duration as the previous note; c16 d e f. It's exactly the same with chords; c16 d b, e f In your ex1, both chords get the same duration as the first c'. (By the way, have you learnt about \relative yet? It seems that you

set-staff-size in 2.1.13

2004-01-22 Thread Paul Scott
With Pedro's packages for Debian sid a test file: #(set-staff-size 20) \score { \context Staff = flute { a4 b c d } } I see that I left out \notes in this simple example but I was getting the same failure with all the files I tested as I reduced the example too far. Paul

set-staff-size in 2.1.13

2004-01-22 Thread Paul Scott
With Pedro's packages for Debian sid a test file: #(set-staff-size 20) \score { \context Staff = flute { a4 b c d } } which works in 2.1.12 when run with 2.1.13 gives: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/music/pima$ lilypond ../test/dy2test.ly lilypond (GNU LilyPond) 2.1.13 Running usr... Now

set-staff-size in 2.1.13

2004-01-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
try convert-ly. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: With Pedro's packages for Debian sid a test file: #(set-staff-size 20) \score { \context Staff = flute { a4 b c d } } which works in 2.1.12 when run with 2.1.13 gives: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/music/pima$ lilypond

Re: set-staff-size in 2.1.13

2004-01-22 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Please always try to run convert-ly on your old files before reporting a problem with a newer version. If you want to follow the quick upgrades in the development versions, you may have to read the ChangeLog to be able to catch up with all the changes. (In this particular case, I notice that the

Re: set-staff-size in 2.1.13

2004-01-22 Thread Paul Scott
Mats Bengtsson wrote: Please always try to run convert-ly on your old files before reporting a problem with a newer version. If you want to follow the quick upgrades in the development versions, you may have to read the ChangeLog to be able to catch up with all the changes. (In this particular

Re: chord/tie/voicing help

2004-01-22 Thread Mats Bengtsson
By mistake, I sent the answer only to Ray. Since we had a copule of misleading answers to the list, it's best to add my attempt to the list archives as well. /Mats Mats Bengtsson wrote: Since the g is the only common note between the two chords, LilyPond will automatically give you the desired

Re: Debian (Woody) packages for Lilypond 2.1.14

2004-01-22 Thread Nick Busigin
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Ferenc Wagner wrote: Binary packages of LilyPond 2.1.14 for Debian Woody are available at http://afavant.elte.hu/~wferi/lilypond Thanks to Han-Wen and Jan for their support! Thanks to Ferenc, Han-Wen, Jan and all! I have just installed 2.1.14 and will be working

Melisma and underscores

2004-01-22 Thread Nancho Alvarez
Hi I would like to know if there is any way to indicate a melisma using the underscore _ (or other character) inside the Lyrics block. I know that to get a melisma the proper thing to do is combine the lines: \notes{c \melisma d e f \melismaEnd g} \lyrics{li -- ly -- pond } but I would like to

Re: chord/tie/voicing help

2004-01-22 Thread Ray McKinney
--- Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since the g is the only common note between the two chords, LilyPond will automatically give you the desired tie if you have f' g'4 ~ g' e' c'2 for example. I knew this, really I did! I was just making things harder for myself than I should have.

Re: Melisma and underscores

2004-01-22 Thread Mats Bengtsson
An half-ugly solution is to do \notes{c d e f g } \lyrics{li -- _ -- _ -- ly -- pond } which is easy to do with find/replace in the files but produces hyphens that are somewhat unevenly spaced. Sorry, can't think of any better solution at the moment. Note also that the lyrics alignment has been

Re: Help! Syntax has me completely stumped!

2004-01-22 Thread Mats Bengtsson
In v1.6.10, Lily set rehearsal marks at the beginning of a line in a nice big, bold face, after the key signature. However, in v2.0.0, it was much more insignificant and slap bang on top of the bar number. It seems that the rehearsal marks in 2.0.x are not typeset in boldface, just one step

Re: HC, again that naked

2004-01-22 Thread Darwin
Banned CD Government don't want me to sell it. See Now %RND_SYB forensic whitlock grape doctorate burroughs concrete belove fanout scholastic extracellular hertzog airpark geld menfolk inherent prim tenneco class accidental ukrainian ah anaerobic spasm byway conflagration bryophyta bauxite

Another tie/accidental question

2004-01-22 Thread t . scharkowski
The following code produces a natural sign for the last but one note that should not be there. How can I hide it? Thomas \score { \notes { \clef bass \key a \major s2. s8 c8~ c2~ c8 c4. } } \paper {} ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL

Stanza Numbers for 2.1.11 on Cygwin

2004-01-22 Thread Rob V
#65279;I just upgraded from 2.0.1 to 2.1.11 on Cygwin and used convert-ly to generate a new file. When I ran the new file through Lilypond, I got the error: Can't find property type-check for 'stz' I looked through the new documentation, and couldn't find the reference to stz anymore. Has

Re: Stanza Numbers for 2.1.11 on Cygwin

2004-01-22 Thread Jeffery B. Rancier
Rob V [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can't find property type-check for 'stz' ,[ ChangeLog ] | 2003-12-31 Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | * scm/define-translator-properties.scm: remove | melismaEngraverBusy, stz property. ` -- Thanks, Jeff