Paul Scott wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
his problem is described under "Bugs" at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Tuning-objects.html#Tuning%20objects
Thank you so much. I'll try it when I get these parts
As a follow up to what Richard said.
My system is setup to type hebrew that includes Tex and LaTex terminal
vim etc.
This in something that is easiest to acheive for RPM based systems
because some kind souls have created rpms for all the needed files and
configuration stuff.
I am still new to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I noticed the announcement of version 2.0.2 and I note the 'stable'
> documentation page show version 2.0.3, but I see no .gz for either
> version on the new server. Is this deliberate?
No, the tarball was lost during the move. Uploading as I type.
--
Han-Wen Nienh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've been copying a number of scores where the \tag will be extremely
> useful. (Thanks for that capability. Another beneficial addition to a
> wonderful program!)
>
> Q: In order to even further reduce the amount of tampering with
> good/complete scores, can we pass
I don't think there's any such option for the lilypond script,
but the lilypond-bin program has an option -e that lets you
run some Scheme code. However, I'm not sure if it works anymore,
if you follow the instructions in 'lilypond-bin --help' to get
more help on the -e flag, you get an error.
Hans
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> If you are proficient in Scheme, you could use the -e SCHEME-CODE
> command line option for lilypond-bin to achieve this, something like
>
> -e "(define-public my-remove-tag part)"
>
>
> (lilypond.py doesn't support this option)
>
> The other solution is to do
>
I recently updated my LilyPond installation (currently at 2.1.16) and tried
out the easy scaling to arbitrary sizes. That's great! I was playing with
it a bit to see how far it would go. I actually had it do a short example
at 1pt and it did it. It was unprintable, of course, and even at a larg
I've been copying a number of scores where the \tag will be extremely
useful. (Thanks for that capability. Another beneficial addition to a
wonderful program!)
Q: In order to even further reduce the amount of tampering with
good/complete scores, can we pass the remove-tag request on the command
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Looking back at Feta ca. v2.1.10, I can see why you felt it looked a
> bit "frantic"; however, I believe I prefer it to the current shape.
> Perhaps splitting the difference would be a good next attempt?
Are you looking at 20pt staffs or 17pt? If not, can you comment
I noticed the announcement of version 2.0.2 and I note the 'stable'
documentation page show version 2.0.3, but I see no .gz for either
version on the new server. Is this deliberate?
(Since I run a customized SuSE 8.2, I prefer to compile from source.)
TIA
/Hans
_
Hello, Han-Wen:
I'm not 100% sure I agree with how far "to the round" you took the
black noteheads, but I'm waiting until I live with them for a while
before arriving at my final judgment.
We're also not sure - let me know what you think.
Well, my instinct is that the noteheads are now too round (
Perhaps I oversimplified a little. If the backend text processing, TeX,
can deal with assigning glyphs to UTF-8 characters, then most of the
l-to-r UTF-8 handling will be straightforward.
There is one issue that most rendering tools that I have seen fall flat
on. That is combining characters. F
Version 2.4.2 of the LilyPond exporting musical score editor NoteEdit is available:
http://rnvs.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/~jan/noteedit/noteedit.html
New features:
- Problems with Flex-2.5.x fixed.
The new Flex begins to behave according to
its documentation. This cau
chip wrote:
I am trying to put the text "Free Time Intro" at the beginning of my
song either below or above an empty measure. I can get it there, but I
cannot get it positioned correctly. Here is the code I have tried -
\property Voice.TextScript \set #'padding = #0.0
<< { s1^\markup { "Free
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Aaron wrote:
> I installed an older version of noteedit and indeed I can type hebrew in
> but the converted lilypond file only has ??? instead of hebrew.
>
> If the base of noteedit is pango it should be hebrew aware, hmn...
>
No, there's no pango, but Qt is as good as
15 matches
Mail list logo
