First of all, read the release notes of version 2.1.29,
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/info-lilypond/2004-03/msg2.html
/Mats
Thomas Scharkowski wrote:
Hello,
I have noticed recently that lilypond produces empty midi-tracks
sometimes. I have already tested several *.ly files I had
I just tried your file here and I can't repeat your error.
To find out what convert-ly is trying to do, just run
convert-ly -s
You can also take a look at the ChangeLog file.
/Mats
Will Oram wrote:
I just installed .30 on my OS X machine. lilypond now pukes when I input
my old score code.
David Bobroff wrote:
Thanks for the \grace {skip} suggestion. I haven't tried it yet.
Somewhat related to this thread:
I want to use the slash style grace without a slur. I discovered in
the acciaccatura definition that this is done with some bit of scheme
which I don't remember at the
On Sunday 14 March 2004 22.09, GoochRules! wrote:
Greetings,
Does lilypond handle f8( f4) and f8~ f4 differently? Is ...~ ...
simply a short cut for ...( ...)? What about f8( f1)( f2) vs. f8~
f1~ f2?
There is a difference in what it means. f8~f basically means f4, while f8(f)
means
The mailing list has been extremely slow during the last weeks
due to the enormous amounts of virus emails swirling around.
When you send questions to the list, please always tell what
LilyPond version you use (and on what kind of system if you
have any question related to the installation).
Lyle
If you use the correct combination of upper case and lower case letters,
in MultiMeasureRest, I think your solution will work.
/Mats
David Bobroff wrote:
I want to adjust the staff-position of a single MultiMeasureRest. That
is, I have an R1 that I want to place hanging from the top staff
The following lines should turn off the MIDI output for chords:
\score{
...
\midi{
...
\translator{
\ChordNameVoiceContext
\remove Note_performer
}
}
}
/Mats
Paul Argentoff wrote:
Hello All.
How can I suppress the output of notated chord names (sounds like piano
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 09:08:06PM -0800, Tiffany Weisman wrote:
Currently C:2 gives Csus2. I would like Cadd2 in
addition. The manual is not very helpful on how to
customize chord names. Can someone help me with this?
Could you use Cadd9 (c:add9) instead?
--
Blake Garretson ---
Tiffany Weisman writes:
Currently C:2 gives Csus2. I would like Cadd2 in
addition. The manual is not very helpful on how to
customize chord names. Can someone help me with this?
You can try c:2.3 , does that help?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music
See http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2004-02/msg00124.html
/Mats
Roland Goretzki wrote:
Hi at all,
since about two days I use lilypond version 2.1.28, and I'm very happy
with it. :)
Nevertheless I can't figure out how to determine the textheigt of page
layout (In the past, with
I only meant the list as a starting point.
I disagree that you shouldn't use redundant
notation. Cadd9 is different from Cadd2 or Csus2. As
is C9sus4 and C11. A higher chord extension suggests a
different way of voicing the chord. The 2 in there
suggests that you want the 2 and 3 or 2 and 1
I have always wondered why we must build the chord
manually. Who uses block chords these days? Wouldn't
it be simpler to say C:2 should look like Cadd2,
specify the markup for the chord expression, treating
chords merely like lyrics and markup, instead of tying
them to notes? Or am I missing
Hi
I'm trying to convert some files from 2.1.5 to 2.1.30, but
1) \pianoAccidentals gets converted wrong. Instead of
#(set-accidental-style 'piano') I get #(set-accidental-style 'piano)'
, str).
Not that bad, I simply corrected the few places by hand.
2) convert-ly chokes on the attached (and
Hi:
This may not be a lilypond issue, but I'm asking the list anyway.
I've been asked to provide online samples with smoother beams; the
complaint is that the sloped beams are jagged-looking (even though they
look fine when they're printed out).
Is there a tweak that will make the beams a
The Postscript code used to draw the beams, just specifies a rectangle
with straight lines between the corners, so the jagged look all depends
on what you have done to the file and how you view it.
I assume that you refer to what the score looks like when you view
a PDF version of it with Acrobat.
Le Dimanche 14 Mars 2004 22:09, GoochRules! a écrit :
Greetings,
Does lilypond handle f8( f4) and f8~ f4 differently? Is ...~ ...
simply a short cut for ...( ...)? What about f8( f1)( f2) vs. f8~
f1~ f2?
--M Peltzer
As indicated in the glossary (not only for non-English users):
I check the changelog obsessively with each new version -- between .28
and .30, I couldn't identify any changes that affected me. I wasn't
aware of convert-ly -s -- very useful; thank you. From the list, only
\center applies to me...I hope.
The problem still remains, however. It appears others
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Tiffany Weisman wrote:
I have always wondered why we must build the chord
manually. Who uses block chords these days? Wouldn't
it be simpler to say C:2 should look like Cadd2,
specify the markup for the chord expression, treating
chords merely like lyrics and markup,
Will Oram wrote:
Everything else, it's failed:
FYI your file converts fine here, with the following output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atte]$ convert-ly will.ly
convert-ly (GNU LilyPond) 2.1.30
Processing `will.ly' ... Applying conversions: 2.1.29, 2.1.30,
\version 2.1.30
spacing = \notes {
\partial
Are you talking about cygwin mirrors?
If so, try running setup.exe again. Note that cygwin mirrors only contain
the stable (2.0.1) version. For development versions see
http://lilypond.org/web/download/
Bert
I checked about 20 of the mirrors, but none of them show
lilypond as available.
Hello list, hello Mats,
You wrote:
See http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2004-02/msg00124.html
/Mats
Thanks.
This partially solves another problem (headers with lilypond-book).
See my second Mail there.
Regards Roland
Hi,
meanwhile (following another tip from Mats, thanks! :)
I've changed the two lines
\input titledefs.tex
\def\preLilyPondExample{\def\mustmakelilypondtitle{}}
to
\input{titledefs}
\def\mustmakelilypondtitle{}
Now it works, but only for the first piece of music
On Monday 15 March 2004 16:48, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Monday 15 March 2004 10:04, Tiffany Weisman wrote:
I only meant the list as a starting point.
I disagree that you shouldn't use redundant
notation. Cadd9 is different from Cadd2 or Csus2. As
is C9sus4 and C11. A higher chord
Your mail to 'xml' with the subject
Re: Your music
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of the
I founded some important but not very well documented feature. It is
important when you use G_8 clef with lyrics, because using the same
minimumVerticalExtent, the lyrics won't be in the same distance from the
staff, as with a G or F clef (it is because the 8 in the clef).
If you want to set the
On Monday 15 March 2004 10:04, Tiffany Weisman wrote:
I only meant the list as a starting point.
I disagree that you shouldn't use redundant
notation. Cadd9 is different from Cadd2 or Csus2. As
is C9sus4 and C11. A higher chord extension suggests a
different way of voicing the chord. The 2
On Monday March 15 2004 05:06, you wrote:
I meant notated and was thinking something along the lines of stacked
dynamics like lyric stanzas (or like you were mentioning) might be a way
it is professionally done; I was guessing. Is there a LilyPond way?
Lookup the section on text markup
David,
I tested your code with Bert's suggestions about the minimum vertical extent. I was
curious about this myself. I think this might be what you want.
cue = \set fontSize = #-5
part = \set fontSize = #0
VoxCues = \notes \context Voice \relative c' {
{
28 matches
Mail list logo
