On 28-Apr-05, at 6:09 PM, Jason Addison wrote:
I've been doing just what you described to a large degree.
I would still like to do what I described in the oringinal post.
I want to do it for a couple of reasons. First to save space,
and second, to make the structure of the music obvious.
If this is
No, not at all.
Firstly I said what I had done not what you should do. I did not do this
because I cannot run "make uninstall" but because I tend to be somewhat
paranoid about these things and don't necessarily assume that either
"make install" or "make uninstall" will actually do what I expect, a
On 4/29/2005, "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 27-Apr-05, at 4:25 PM, Jason Addison wrote:
>> The 1st and 3rd times have the same ending.
>> The 2nd and 4th times have the same ending.
>> The 3rd time has a different _begining_.
>
>Yikes. I've never seen this in printed music. W
By suggesting that I create a new user, are you implying that I cannot
"make uninstall" before installing the next version?
josiah
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Bernard Hurley wrote:
I'll tell you what I did:
1) Create a new user ( called it "invisible" but coul be anything) for
installing lily locally
2)
I've been doing just what you described to a large degree.
I would still like to do what I described in the oringinal post.
I want to do it for a couple of reasons. First to save space,
and second, to make the structure of the music obvious.
If this is a serious faux pas in music engraving, let
On 27-Apr-05, at 4:25 PM, Jason Addison wrote:
How can I indicate alternate sections other than the ending?
For example, suppose that I have a piece of
music 4 measures long which repeats 4 times
for a total of 16 measures.
The 1st and 3rd times have the same ending.
The 2nd and 4th times have the
Graham Percival wrote:
> > 1) Create a new user ( called it "invisible" but coul be anything) for
> > installing lily locally
>
> You don't need to be a new user.
>
No, you don't, but a lot of Debian users get pretty good at
installing/de-installing Debian packages, but never install anything
On 28-Apr-05, at 3:34 PM, Bernard Hurley wrote:
1) Create a new user ( called it "invisible" but coul be anything) for
installing lily locally
You don't need to be a new user.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2003-01/msg00014.html
___
lil
I'll tell you what I did:
1) Create a new user ( called it "invisible" but coul be anything) for
installing lily locally
2) Log in as "invisible" and got latest lily from CVS with
CVS_RSH=ssh cvs -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/lilypond co
Of course you don't have to do this,
> "DJB" == D Josiah Boothby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DJB> If I wanted to compile 2.5 in Debian, while keeping 2.4, what do I
DJB> need to do to make it something like Pedro's "lilypond-snapshot"?
There were always problems with that (google lilypond-book
lilypond-snapshot). So I'v
If I wanted to compile 2.5 in Debian, while keeping 2.4, what do I need to
do to make it something like Pedro's "lilypond-snapshot"?
Josiah
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello,
I could not find a way to put the ossia above the staff.
Is there a trick to achive it?
Thanks,
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OK, so that's how they have solved it in the installation!
That's fina and then there's no need for the lilypond-profile.
The problem is probably that you have the new teTeX 3.0,
which is more strict regarding the placement of files than
earlier versions. LilyPond was updated correspondingly in ver
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I don't know any details about the SuSE 9.3 system or the
corresponding LilyPond package, but on many systems, the
lilypond package will install a file called lilypond-profile
or lilypond-profile.sh or lilypond.sh or something similar in
/etc/profile.d/, which means that it is
I don't know any details about the SuSE 9.3 system or the
corresponding LilyPond package, but on many systems, the
lilypond package will install a file called lilypond-profile
or lilypond-profile.sh or lilypond.sh or something similar in
/etc/profile.d/, which means that it is sourced automatically
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Everything should be included in the lilypond package you use.
> These Type1 font file are probably installed in
> /usr/share/lilypond/2.4.4/fonts/type1/
ls there return:
feta11.pfa feta-braces-d.pfa feta-din8.pfa Fontmap.lily
feta13.pfa feta-braces-e.p
Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maurizio Monge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Thanx, i am now triying to write a macro to realize barre
>> comfortably. I also found the following code in an older
>> port, but i doesn't compile (2.5.20). What's wrong?
>> I really would like to end u
In the development versions, it is now easy to redefine how the
titling is done for each score, see the bottom of the page at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Creating-titles.html#Creating-titles
For page breaks, see the section on page breaking.
/Mats
Fairchild w
Maurizio Monge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanx, i am now triying to write a macro to realize barre
> comfortably. I also found the following code in an older
> port, but i doesn't compile (2.5.20). What's wrong?
> I really would like to end up with a function like:
>\barre #"IV" { c d e }
Everything should be included in the lilypond package you use.
These Type1 font file are probably installed in
/usr/share/lilypond/2.4.4/fonts/type1/
What value of LOCAL_LILYPOND_DATADIR is reported if you run
lilypond --verbose --help ?
Also, what does
printenv TEXMF
return?
/Mats
Bo Herlin wro
Hi,
I think many of the failed barchecks was because of something like
\acciaccatura \stemDown cis32 a4
I will have to change them to
\acciaccatura { \stemDown cis32 } a4
also, having more than 1 \acciaccatura causes an error,
example, \acciaccatura cis32 \acciaccatura dis32 a4
therefore,
\
21 matches
Mail list logo
