Hi all!
I've recently noticed that when I print one of my PDF files, the chord
names come out garbled -- all 'm's or 'n's or 'u's and the like. The
on-screen display is fine, as is the PS file. And when I print the PS
file, it's perfect.
I'm using 2.5.29 (waiting for 2.6.x or 2.7.x to come
On Sep 22, 2005, at 6:50 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Trevor Bača wrote:
On 9/22/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trevor Bača wrote:
Rendering /input/regression/font-name.ly under OS X with 2.7.9
generates ...
is this 10.3 or 10.4 ?
10.4.2
The problem is with th
When I click on the link in Acrobate Reader, IE has
Invalid Syntax Error as the window title
This appeasr in the address bar:
textedit:///cygdrive/C/Music/Powerhouse/PowerHouse.ly:422:4:32
And the window has:
The page cannot be displayed.
(It's interesting that IE comes up, since I have Firef
Ruud van Silfhout wrote:
> As I am just an amateur regarding music notation I have a question
> concening the attached piece of music.
> The natural shown below the last note, is that meant as a natural
> normally placed before the note? And is this an alternative (standard)
> notation for acciden
On Friday 23 September 2005 01:31 pm, Ruud van Silfhout wrote:
> As I am just an amateur regarding music notation I have a question
> concening the attached piece of music.
> The natural shown below the last note, is that meant as a natural
> normally placed before the note?
It is a comment. If
Dear Sir/madam,
I am an entry level keyboard player (Not professional). I hope you can help
me to answer my question.
Instead of sitting and listening several time to learn and play a music
from CD's of own choice, is there any software available in the music
industry to generate nota
Not sure if this workaround was posted recently as it was somewhat
difficult to find. If you are getting this error in 2.6.3 or 2.7.10 on
FC4:
GNU LilyPond 2.7.10
/usr/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-13.scm:159:1: In procedure dynamic-link
in expres sion (load-extension "libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1"
Hello,
I'm trying to build Lilypond 2.5 as the one that came with SUSE 9.3 doesn't
work. My problem is fontforge. The 'old' fontforge that came with SUSE has
been uninstalled, I found and downloaded the 'new' fontforge from the web
but I cannot seem to get the compilers to find it - so my co
--- Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> Data: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:36:15 +0200
> De: Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Para: Alexandre Reche e Silva
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Assunto: Re: midi don't ties...
>
> Please always keep the discussion on the mailing
> list, for the
> benefit
> "Graham" == Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Graham> On 20-Sep-05, at 10:11 PM, Peter Chubb wrote:
>> How do I get Lily to use a more sensible font for PDF output?
>> Because I don't have New Centiury Schoolbok installed on my system,
>> lyrics come out in Courier (and look awful
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Peter Mogensen wrote:
>
>> Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>>> Read the NEWS in the documentation for version 2.6.
>>
>> Unless I'm mistaken \stopStaff \startStaff doesn't stop output of notes.
>> Only the staff-lines.
>>
>> To use this, it would require to insert skip-notes in
Peter Mogensen wrote:
Ruud van Silfhout wrote:
As I am just an amateur regarding music notation I have a question
concening the attached piece of music.
The natural shown below the last note, is that meant as a natural
normally placed before the note? And is this an alternative (standard)
no
Ruud van Silfhout wrote:
> As I am just an amateur regarding music notation I have a question
> concening the attached piece of music.
> The natural shown below the last note, is that meant as a natural
> normally placed before the note? And is this an alternative (standard)
> notation for accident
As I am just an amateur regarding music notation I have a question
concening the attached piece of music.
The natural shown below the last note, is that meant as a natural
normally placed before the note? And is this an alternative (standard)
notation for accidentals? And if so, can this be don
would fundable.org be a viable option? from the faq, the segment on how
much it costs:
http://www.fundable.org/help#howmuch
apparently, the price is dependent upon paypal. i am on the morning end
of an all-nighter, so it is entirely possible that i'm missing
something.
josiah
___
The only two available in the program is the default one
and fraction-tuplet-formatter. If you want to do your own,
it's probably easiest to use the definitions of the already
existing functions as the starting point, see
/usr/share/lilypond/2.6.3/scm/translation-functions.scm
or wherever the file
To learn about formatting tuplets, I get into:
tupletNumberFormatFunction (procedure)
Function taking a music as input, producing a string. This function is
called to determine the text to print on a tuplet bracket.
Then how can I learn what are the options and their syntax, for e
Assuming that you mean vertical alignment throughout, I now understand
why you complained about alignment on the letter 'd'.
Maybe it helps to use a trick similar to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-08/msg00305.html
/Mats
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What version of lilypond
>
>What version of lilypond are you using? I just tried this in 2.7.8 and
>it looks
>ok to me... what exactly is the problem with the alignment?
>
>- Graham
>
Sorry, I've forgot: lilypond 2.7.10 in macos 10.4.2
BTW, the discussion now is about another problem (that I wanted to send to
the list a
Yes I did try this already, Here's my sample, I want
the word "for" in the second verse to land on the
eighth note in the beginning of the second measure. I
included a png of my output. As you see in my code
the \set ignoreMelismata is one word before the word I
want to ignore the tie. I tried s
I would also like to
insert a comment so that there are no bar numbers visible (since any
non-critical information is a distraction I'd like to avoid).
I think there are examples in either Tips&Tricks or Regression Tests about how
to control bar number visibility. (search for barNumberVisibil
On Friday 23 September 2005 10.45, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Wouldn't it be possible to use the new support for laissez vibrer
> in version 2.7.10, to draw these ties?
That's #1 in Han-Wen's sponsorable solution (see thread
"Co-sponsoring Was: Ties in second endings")
--
Erik
___
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to use the new support for laissez vibrer
in version 2.7.10, to draw these ties?
that's exactly the feature I am trying to raise money for.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
__
On 23 Sep 2005, at 05:43, Graham Percival wrote:
On 22-Sep-05, at 4:47 PM, Suzanne Blatt wrote:
Can anyone shed some light as to why the manual examples are not
working?
Many of the manual examples are presented as fragments -- ie
It is also safer to pick examples from the HTML version,
Trevor Bača wrote:
I'm not sure that I understand what you mean. Do you want the systems
to be vertically aligned against the page boundaries with their staves
(ie. the 5-line staff symbols) iso. their bounding boxes?
Yes, precisely. It would (theoretically) therefore be possible for the
bound
Peter Mogensen wrote:
You're right. But the I was trying to make is that if something requires
desing-considerations for a clean solution, then it can be difficult to
find "small useful solutions", which together gets you all the way.
I'm not in a position to evaluate whether this is the case, s
Trevor Bača wrote:
Maybe Graham or Mats or Nicolas can explain how to adjust the x-axis
alignment of edge text independently?
Unfortunately, that's not possible with \override, but why don't you try
something like
\markup { \center { foo } }
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ht
On Sunday 18 September 2005 20.26, Matthew Thibeault wrote:
> Hello and thanks for such a fantastic program. I am a music teacher
> with experience with programs like Sibelius. I am just learning
> Lilypond in hopes of using it with the students I teach at the School
> of the Arts in San Francisco.
Erik Sandberg wrote:
>>Define "proper".
>>The above requires you to add the hack to all staves if you need it in
>>one staff. That's too much trouble for my lilypond use.
>
>
> - it's future compatible (I have plans to fix the grace note bug).
> - with your solution, the tied note is placed sligh
Trevor Bača wrote:
On 9/21/05, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 20-Sep-05, at 11:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
\relative c'' {
\override TextSpanner #'edge-text = #'("s.p." . "ord.")
\override TextSpanner #'bound-padding = #1.0
\override TextSpanner #'dash-fraction = #'()
Wouldn't it be possible to use the new support for laissez vibrer
in version 2.7.10, to draw these ties?
/Mats
D Josiah Boothby wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 09:33 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Ties are not normally continued into second endings, but a standard
trick is to add a tie from an
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-08/msg00416.html
for some instructions.
/Mats
Ben van Zanten wrote:
Hello,
I hope this is not a FAQ but in the past I've created such a nice
collection of music in V2.4.2, hardly a single one will run in 2.6 or
higher.
I found I'd
On Friday 23 September 2005 01.19, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > IIRC think I have set the price at EUR 110 for #1 + #2 (incl VAT and/or
> > transfer costs, depending on where you live.)
>
> Sorry, I'm a bit uncoherent. The point I'm trying to make is that the
> "Grand Unifi
Read the section on "Text Marks" in the manual.
/Mats
D Josiah Boothby wrote:
I recall a thread on this subject a few months ago, but I have not been
able to find it in the archives.
I'm trying to create a tempo marking -- something like "Andante" -- that
only shows in the top line of a s
On Thursday 22 September 2005 11.37, Peter Mogensen wrote:
> Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > why not do something like this?
> >
> > \new DrumStaff {
> >\drummode {
> > \repeat volta 2 { sn4 sn sn sn}
> > \alternative {
> >{sn4 sn sn sn }
> >{\grace s
Stephan Moss writes:
> When I click on a note or other object in Acrobat Reader, it invokes IE
> with the textedit url and gives an error.
What is the error?
> This is probably simple and probably documented somewhere I missed.
This is what the installer does
WriteRegStr HKCR "textedit" "U
36 matches
Mail list logo
