Dear Folks,
I want to install Lilypond on Fedora Core 4. I am so grateful for the
effort that you folks have put into it. Unfortunately I cannot
install it, since an appropriate ghostscript-devel seems to be
unavailable, and a number of other things I need depend on that,
including
Hello,
I have installed 2.7.22 version of Lilypond. There is no any more
script ps2png. I've read in the archive, that a debian user should
install tth package. It is a ps2png program in tth package, but it is
not the same program (it doesn't work properly). I've got the script
ps2png.py from the
Nick Urbanik wrote:
Dear Folks,
I want to install Lilypond on Fedora Core 4. I am so grateful for the
effort that you folks have put into it. Unfortunately I cannot
install it, since an appropriate ghostscript-devel seems to be
unavailable, and a number of other things I need depend on that,
If you have ImageMagick installed, a good alternative is the program
convert.
For example, you can do
convert myfile.ps myfile.png
/Mats
Anna Choma wrote:
Hello,
I have installed 2.7.22 version of Lilypond. There is no any more
script ps2png. I've read in the archive, that a debian user
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:41:15AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Nick Urbanik wrote:
Dear Folks,
I want to install Lilypond on Fedora Core 4. I am so grateful for
the effort that you folks have put into it. Unfortunately I
cannot install it, since an appropriate ghostscript-devel
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:21:50AM +1100, Nick Urbanik wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:41:15AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Nick Urbanik wrote:
Dear Folks,
I want to install Lilypond on Fedora Core 4. I am so grateful for
the effort that you folks have put into it.
Dear Folks,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:45:02AM +1100, Nick Urbanik wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:21:50AM +1100, Nick Urbanik wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:41:15AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Nick Urbanik wrote:
Dear Folks,
[snip]
Are the *.src.rpm files available?
Why did you install 2.6.0 while 2.6.4 is available?
Fred
Steve wrote:
Hi,
Installed lilypond on my PC running Window XP Pro SP2. Installation completed
with error. Downloaded test.ly file and followed instructions on
http://lilypond.org/web/install/windows
Got error saying could not find
Greetings,
I have been using \triangle within markup, e.g. c4^\markup
{ \triangle } .
Until upgrading to Lilypond 2.6.5 from 2.6.3 I had no problems. I am,
however, able to use \flat and \sharp in Lilypond 2.6.5.
As an experiment, I reinstalled 2.6.3 and am still receiving the
following
Hi folks!
I have been using version 2.7.20 on FreeBSD very successfully for a few
weeks now. Using jEdit for my .ly files, which is nice too.
Now.
I recently acquired a Windoze computer (XP) and installed 2.7.18 on there.
My question: Are there any syntax differences, etc. between those
Gordon Gilbert wrote:
Also, I tried to install jEdit for Windoze on that machine, and was
unsuccessful. Does anybody know what I must do for that? I'd rather
not have to use the MS text editor if I can help it. Or is there
another good editor for Lilypond that I can install easily on
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 20.57, Gordon Gilbert wrote:
Hi folks!
I have been using version 2.7.20 on FreeBSD very successfully for a few
weeks now. Using jEdit for my .ly files, which is nice too.
Now.
I recently acquired a Windoze computer (XP) and installed 2.7.18 on there.
My
Nick Urbanik wrote:
Okay, ghostscript-8.15.1-3.1.src.rpm is available from rawhide; have
built it okay. It's a bit alarming that Red Hat didn't sign the file.
Now the next question: is ghostscript-libs-7.07-41.i386.rpm made from
a hacked up ghostscript-7.07-41.src.rpm from Fedora Core 4
Nick Urbanik wrote:
$ sudo rpm -Uhv ghostscript-*8.15.1-3.1.i386.rpm
ghostscript-compat-libs-7.07-41.1nu.i386.rpm
Password:
error: Failed dependencies:
libijs.so is needed by (installed) gimp-print-4.2.7-7.i386
So what am I doing wrong?
Come to think of it, the compat libs package
Dear Han-Wen,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:21:46AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Nick Urbanik wrote:
Okay, ghostscript-8.15.1-3.1.src.rpm is available from rawhide;
have built it okay. It's a bit alarming that Red Hat didn't sign
the file.
Now the next question: is
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:23:59AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Nick Urbanik wrote:
$ sudo rpm -Uhv ghostscript-*8.15.1-3.1.i386.rpm
ghostscript-compat-libs-7.07-41.1nu.i386.rpm
Password:
error: Failed dependencies:
libijs.so is needed by (installed) gimp-print-4.2.7-7.i386
16 matches
Mail list logo
