Thanks for the fast reply, but now in 2.10.9 the syllables sau and rus
are not applied to Voice lahlah.
-Original Message-
From: Georg Dummer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:52 AM
To: 'lilypond-user'
Subject: associatedVoice in 2.10.8
Hi all,
I changed the
Jean-marc, thank you, I've been on the road the whole week, just back.
Am 02/01/2007 um 11:23 schrieb Jean-marc LEGRAND:
Hi !
I don't quite understand your question, but maybe the answer is :
\version 2.10.0
\relative c' {
\clef treble
\key bes \major
\time 3/4
\partial 4*1 f4
bes \(( d8
Am 02/01/2007 um 21:43 schrieb Brett Duncan:
Just a small typo:
If you need, say, an eight-note anacrusis
should be
If you need, say, an /eighth/-note anacrusis
Of course! - Thank you.
Manuel
Brett
--
Brett Duncan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Always do right - this will gratify some and
Am 03/01/2007 um 13:20 schrieb luis jure:
i'm sorry i'm leaving on holidays for a month, i would like to
collaborate on the spanish translation. i've been teaching theory
and harmony for so many years, that i have very strong opinions on
terminological issues... :-)
best,
lj
Hola Luis,
Manuel libros at limay.de writes:
Kennan has quite a few examples from Stravinsky, Ligeti, Webern,
Schoenberg, Stockhausen, and others, especially when dealing with
full orchestra and with percussion, but it is not mainly dedicated to
contemporary techniques.
Manuel
Kennan is the
On Friday 05 January 2007 22:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. . . The { m1 m2 m3 } syntax is used for repeat alternatives
already, and the meaning is very clear: Each music expression between the
outer { } is a separate argument. Note also that the tupletSequence
function would be
Thank you for the fast answer. Now I have the problem that the syllable
sau is applied one note to late to voice lahlah.
\relative \new Voice = lahlah {
\set Staff.autoBeaming = ##f
c4
\new Voice = alternative {
\voiceOne \tiny
% show associations
Linda Seltzer wrote:
Dear Friends,
Having previously worked at ATT Labs, where I was a member of the User
Experience Forum, I would like to make a few comments as a relative
outsider seeing the Lilypond project for the first time. This is a great
endeavor and the software output is
Hi, Linda (et al.):
I would greatly encourage the project to focus on the user interface
and the user experience if this is to catch on in a large way.
I totally agree: if Lilypond is to catch on in a large way (with
the less-geeky public), then the UI has to be vastly improved.
However,
Am 06/01/2007 um 22:14 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
I totally agree: if Lilypond is to catch on in a large way (with
the less-geeky public), then the UI has to be vastly improved.
I certainly don't feel the need of a graphic interface. I have
recently seen several composers happily pushing
My point when I started this topic was not to change the whole definition of
the \times function. In fact, I think the function works quite well as it
is. I was mostly talking about improving the interface - i.e. the words
and the syntax we use to call the functions - to make it more intuitive,
Frédéric Chiasson wrote:
My point when I started this topic was not to change the whole
definition of the \times function. In fact, I think the function works
quite well as it is. I was mostly talking about improving the
interface - i.e . the words and the syntax we use to call the
functions
. . . Note also that the tupletSequence
function would be implemented entirely in Scheme . . .
I'm not very fluent in Scheme, so this is a naive question.
I presume that ratios like 3:2 (or 2/3) could be made into some kind of
object type (possibly a moment). So I could imagine that it
Hi Everyone,
I've been working with Lilypond 2.11.0 for a while and recently tried
2.11.9.
When running the new version the following statements are ignored
\override Staff.VerticalAxisGroup #'Y-extent = #'(0 . 10).
I've been playing around with getting more even output from Lilypond same
14 matches
Mail list logo
