Re: accidentals disappear

2007-01-29 Thread Calvin Mitcham
thanks guys. the linux installer worked smooth as silk, and all my accidentals are found!! calvin. p.s. and while i'm at it, thanks developers. lilypond rocks! Cameron Horsburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 06:43:59PM -0800, Calvin Mitcham wrote: > > Mats Beng

Re: Lilypond Tool

2007-01-29 Thread Father Gordon Gilbert
Graham, Thanks for the advice. Yes I did indeed install the latest bleeding-edge version of Lily. Love it!! My compile times are now in the neighbourhood of five to 40 seconds. (I think the longer times are when my machine gets itself bogged down somehow, and I simply reboot.) On other subje

Re: converting from ver 2.0 to 2.10 problems

2007-01-29 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Mats Bengtsson escreveu: > Please send future bug reports to the bug-lilypond mailing list. > I forward your email there. please file bugreports against the latest 2.10 version, not 2.10.0 -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code

Re: Lilypond Tool

2007-01-29 Thread Graham Percival
Bertalan Fodor wrote: Five minutes? Really? Could you send me a file with this processing time? Windows XP Pro, Lilypond 2.11.5, jEdit 4.3 pre-9, Lilypond Tool 2.10.3 Gordon, please do not use an old unstable version like 2.11.5. Please either use the stable version (2.10.x), or use the mo

Re: converting from ver 2.0 to 2.10 problems

2007-01-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Please send future bug reports to the bug-lilypond mailing list. I forward your email there. /Mats Mike Blackstock wrote: I need to convert .ly version 2.0 files to version 2.10 Conversion stops with the following output: convert-ly (GNU LilyPond) 2.10.0 Processing `trio_flute.ly'... Apply

Re: overriding default tuplet number

2007-01-29 Thread Bret Whissel
Thanks, Trevor. Your solution doesn't seem to work in 2.8, but I'll keep it in mind for after I upgrade. In the mean time, Bert's solution does seem to work for 2.8, though it is syntax with which I was unfamiliar before now. Ole, I was trying to write the time equivalent of \time 12/8 bf

converting from ver 2.0 to 2.10 problems

2007-01-29 Thread Mike Blackstock
I need to convert .ly version 2.0 files to version 2.10 Conversion stops with the following output: convert-ly (GNU LilyPond) 2.10.0 Processing `trio_flute.ly'... Applying conversion: 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.7, 2.1.10, 2.1.11, 2.1.12, 2.1.13, 2.1.14, 2.1.15, 2.1.16, 2.1.17, 2.1.18, 2.1.

Re: overriding default tuplet number

2007-01-29 Thread Trevor Bača
On 1/29/07, Ole Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: do you mean \times 3/2 { a8. c } ?? best ole Am 29.01.2007 um 16:53 schrieb Bertalan Fodor: > Try > > \times 3/2 { a4*1/2 c } > > Bert > > > Bret Whissel írta: >> On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 15:55 +0100, Ole Schmidt wrote: >> >>> \times 3/2 >>>

Re: overriding default tuplet number

2007-01-29 Thread Ole Schmidt
do you mean \times 3/2 { a8. c } ?? best ole Am 29.01.2007 um 16:53 schrieb Bertalan Fodor: Try \times 3/2 { a4*1/2 c } Bert Bret Whissel írta: On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 15:55 +0100, Ole Schmidt wrote: \times 3/2 Thanks, Ole. This will put a "2" over the bracket, but the time scal

Re: proposal: second style for quartertone accidentals

2007-01-29 Thread Orm Finnendahl
Am 29. Januar 2007, 12:24 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > Maximilian Albert escreveu: > > > > Well, I'd be delighted to give it a try because this sounds exactly like > > the kind of rather easy task which merely distracts the core team from > > doing more difficult and really important st

Re: Lead sheet examples?

2007-01-29 Thread Robert Kennedy
Late last night I wrote: > This looks like it should work, and LP accepts it OK, but it doesn't > have any effect... Embarassingly, now it seems to work. I must have been having some kind of version control problem when I wrote that. Many thanks to everyone who helped! -- Robert Kennedy

Re: overriding default tuplet number

2007-01-29 Thread Bertalan Fodor
Try \times 3/2 { a4*1/2 c } Bert Bret Whissel írta: On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 15:55 +0100, Ole Schmidt wrote: \times 3/2 Thanks, Ole. This will put a "2" over the bracket, but the time scaling is incorrect, since the notes will be lengthened rather than shortened. The goal is to put 2

Re: overriding default tuplet number

2007-01-29 Thread Bret Whissel
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 15:55 +0100, Ole Schmidt wrote: > \times 3/2 Thanks, Ole. This will put a "2" over the bracket, but the time scaling is incorrect, since the notes will be lengthened rather than shortened. The goal is to put 2 quarter notes in the span of 3 eighth notes; each quarter note sh

Re: overriding default tuplet number

2007-01-29 Thread Ole Schmidt
\times 3/2 best ole Am 29.01.2007 um 15:43 schrieb Bret Whissel: I've got music in a triple meter, and I'd like the tuplet in the following instance to read "2" instead of the default "4". Anyone know how I can achieve that? \include "english.ly" \score { \relative c'' { \time 12/

overriding default tuplet number

2007-01-29 Thread Bret Whissel
I've got music in a triple meter, and I'd like the tuplet in the following instance to read "2" instead of the default "4". Anyone know how I can achieve that? \include "english.ly" \score { \relative c'' { \time 12/8 \key d \major bf4. \times 3/4 { a4 c } bf4. a } } (I'm using L

Re: Lead sheet examples?

2007-01-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Robert Kennedy wrote: To reduce the spacing, you can do \new ChordNames \with { chordChanges = ##t voltaOnThisStaff = ##t \override VoltaBracket #'minimum-space =#0 } { ... } This looks like it should work, and LP accepts it OK, but it doesn't have any effect. The vol

Re: Lead sheet examples?

2007-01-29 Thread Bertalan Fodor
You could hack it by adding \override VoltaBracket #'Y-extent = ##f Bert ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Lead sheet examples?

2007-01-29 Thread Robert Kennedy
> For the record, the answer to your original question can also be found in > an example in the Tips and Tricks document (I'm sure it's included in the > LilyPond Snippet Repository as well). Many thanks for the pointers. I hadn't even discovered the existence of the Tips and Tricks document until

RE: PNG size issue

2007-01-29 Thread lala lala
I use debian Linux and lily 2.10.6 (installed with provided installer). (but I reproduce it on windows XP too). In fact on linux, the lilypond trace says that lily use gs version 8.55 SVN pre release. And on my debian system I got an old version (8.01) of ghostscript. That's why running the gs c

Re: PNG size issue

2007-01-29 Thread Orm Finnendahl
lala lala wrote: >More weird : if I check lily output I see that lily call : >gs -dEPSCrop -dGraphicsAlphaBits=4 -dTextAlphaBits=4 -dNOPAUSE >-sDEVICE=png16m -sOutputFile="test.png" -r72 "test.ps" -c quit > >When I executed this line after running lilypond my PNG is overwritted >by a PNG with th

Re: PNG size issue

2007-01-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
What operating system do you use? When I tried it here, I got a 595x842px PNG file directly. Regarding black/white, isn't it just to avoid using setting the color property in your LilyPond files? ;-) Otherwise, I recommend you to search in the documentation for Ghostscript or any graphics proce