Just read the section on "Chord names" in the LilyPond user manual, to
get an idea of what can be done in LilyPond. I'm surprised that you
managed to find out about this mailing
list but not about the user manual.
/Mats
Quoting Rich E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi there,
I'd like to be able to
Hello- Below is first movement of a String Quartet.
When I compile it the first pdf page had two systems and it isn't until the 5th
page that I get 3 systems on a page. Yet there is obviously room on the 2-4th
pages for 3 systems per page. Is the problem in my coding or something else?
Thanks-J
Hello list, hello Tom,
You wrote:
> > . . . if convert-ly doesn't work, most of the note-entry should be
> > straightforward to reuse, leaving organization and tweaking to be done
> > (for me, that usually takes about half of the time of preparing a
> > score, so that's not so bad).
>
> [ ... ]
>
alcor.concordia.ca> writes:
> I wonder what the typical note-entry-time/layout-tweak-time ratio is
> amongst LilyPond users.
I'm probably not average (who is?), but I guess I spend about 40% of the time
spent on a score on initial note entry, 30% on layout tweaking, 20% on
proofreading and
hello,
i need to do a bunch of three-horn arrangements of pop tunes; and it's
better for me to check everything if all three staffs are on the same page
in a score. my first attempt was to write all the parts individually, then
combine them into a score. This seems to be the easiest way with my
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:39:39 -0400, steve berthiaume wrote:
> i need to do a bunch of three-horn arrangements of pop tunes; and it's
> better for me to check everything if all three staffs are on the same page
> in a score. my first attempt was to write all the parts individually, then
> combine t
