This is a clear bug, which is a regression againts version 2.10.
I forward it to bug-lilypond. Perhaps Graham finds the example
too complicated, so it would be good if you can reduce it to a
minimal example that illustrates the same problem.
The problem may be somewhat related to
http://code.googl
On 10/30/07, Monk Panteleimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It appears that 2.11 is trying to keep single staves from occupying their
> own (last) page. That's a good idea too but, at least in my case, it seems
> to be doing so at the expense of good lyric spacing in a ChoirStaff.
> Lyrics should be
It appears that 2.11 is trying to keep single staves from occupying their
own (last) page. That's a good idea too but, at least in my case, it seems
to be doing so at the expense of good lyric spacing in a ChoirStaff.
Lyrics should be equidistant from higher and lower staves, right? Instead
they ar
On 27 Oct 2007, at 19:29, Immanuel Litzroth wrote:
Lilypond doesn't work on Leopard as it did on Tiger.
I upgraded my system (install new system with keeping of
settings). If I try to run the unix commandline executables
I get the message
/bin/bash: /Users/immanuel/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/
Hi, what is happening here? The first bar shows the version that a want,
the second then adds some markup text -- and screws the rest totally up!
Greetings
Till
%%
%EXAMPLE
%%
\version "2.11.33"
u = { \change Staff = upper \stemDown \slurDown }
m = { \change Staff = lower \ste
I've only recently working with \lyricmode (and with a very old version) but
seems that I get around that by using the capital R rests...
R1 * 8
> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:46:08 +0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> lilypond-user@gnu.org> Subject: Re: No lyrics for first 8 bars> > There are -
Hello, all!
Trevor offered
If any of the developers are looking for a sponsored project,
I would be happy to help sponsor this improvement
I second the offer -- especially if, as Trevor suggests, the fix handles
(1) non-grouped staves (e.g., not necessarily in a PianoStaff or
StaffGroup)
On 10/29/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/28/07, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Should ties go in Rhythms or Expressive marks?
> >
> > Pros of 1.3.2 Curves
> > - it makes a nice progression from ties, slurs, phrasing slurs
> > - beginners are more likely to look fo
On 10/29/07, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Montag, 29. Oktober 2007 schrieb Trevor Bača:
> > Unfortunately, I know of no better way to create cross-staff chords
> > than the documentation you point to in the manual.
> >
> > I'm just finishing a score with cross-staff chords, so
Am Montag, 29. Oktober 2007 schrieb Trevor Bača:
> Unfortunately, I know of no better way to create cross-staff chords
> than the documentation you point to in the manual.
>
> I'm just finishing a score with cross-staff chords, so I know what
> you're going through.
Yes, it's particularly bad, as
On 10/28/07, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should ties go in Rhythms or Expressive marks?
>
> Pros of 1.3.2 Curves
> - it makes a nice progression from ties, slurs, phrasing slurs
> - beginners are more likely to look for ties in here
>
>
> Pros of 1.2.1 Writing rhythms
> - ties real
On 10/27/07, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> For the musicxml2ly application, I'm looking into how to convert cross-staff
> chords in PianoStaves (i.e. chords that have some notes in the upper and some
> in the lower staff). The documentation talks about these in
> http://lily
Graham Percival wrote:
Currently, we have
3 Changing defaults
* 3.1 Automatic notation
o 3.1.1 Automatic accidentals
o 3.1.2 Setting automatic beam behavior
Should we keep the material 3.1 in here, or move it into Pitches and
Rhythms?
I definitely think these belo
Dominic Neumann wrote:
There are - at least - two ways.
The quick and dirty one is to substitute the _ _ _ by \repeat unfold
20 { \skip 1 }
(where 20 should be the number of notes).
The more elegant way can be found here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-03/msg00190.html
Op maandag 29 oktober 2007, schreef Tao Cumplido:
> I am in e-flat minor and I want to print a g-sharp and lilypond puts by
> default a natural and a sharp sign before the g. now I want the natural
> sign to disappear but can't figure out which accidental-style I have to
> use.
See http://lilypond
Hi Lilypond Team
Thank you very much for this great product. I love Lilypond! It helps me a lot
for learning my stuff on Sax.
This Weekend i did buy Mac OS X 10.5 and it seems that Lilypond doesnt work
on it. The program hands during start up.
Is there a fix coming soon?
Best Regards
Giusep
Hi,
I am in e-flat minor and I want to print a g-sharp and lilypond puts by default
a natural and a sharp sign before the g.
now I want the natural sign to disappear but can't figure out which
accidental-style I have to use.
regards,
Tao
--
GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 F
17 matches
Mail list logo
