I'm a pretty new Lilypond user, about a week old in fact, so please be
gentle.
As a learning exercise I have been entering a keyboard arrangement of
one of Reger's Geistliche Gesänge, including the lyrics, which I had
previously done in Sibelius (opening bars appended as Morgengesang.ly).
I
I was going to say that I didn't see a problem with doing the file
without the bar lines in the text and removing the bar engraver, and
then I realised that you're using 2.10.33. While I can't speak for
that version, in 2.11, it works fine without the workaround. I would
highly recommend
Hi!
How would I use a different articulation for the score and the lyrics?
I'm writing a score for a jazz standard.
On the three first notes of the theme are to be played legato, but with a
sylable on each note. I tried a phrasing slur, but then it collides with an
articulation (I'm using
2008/5/8 Jean-Alexis Montignies :
On the three first notes of the theme are to be played legato, but with a
sylable on each note. I tried a phrasing slur, but then it collides with an
articulation (I'm using 2.11.33).
You could use \set ignoreMelismata = ##t. To switch it off, use \unset
2008/5/8 Jean-Alexis Montignies [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
Hi Jean-Alexis,
if you happen to be a French-speaking LilyPonder, you might be
interested in knowing that there's also a special LilyPond mailing
list in French:
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user-fr
Cheers,
Valentin
Thanks for your reply. I went with 2.10.33 as the stable version, but
if 2.11 is usable, I might try it. Is it possible to have both
coexisting on the same system? (Windows XP)
I removed the \markup {...} construct from the first line of lyrics and
removed Bar_engraver from the Lyrics context.
in 2.11, the text is typeset between the bars. That is, the text fits
between the bars, and there's no need to white out part of the bar
line to accommodate the text.
Am 08.05.2008 um 12:08 schrieb Kim Bastin:
Thanks for your reply. I went with 2.10.33 as the stable version,
but
if 2.11
Greetings -
I'm working on Repeats for the GDP (yep, still). Currently, Short
Repeats includes percent repeats and tremolos (for strings, tremolos
include both fingered and bowed tremolos). Percent repeats is not a
term I have heard outside of LilyPond, and if I were looking for those
repeats,
Hi Ralph,
My Essential Dictionary of Music Notation uses the terms
beat repetitions
measure repetitions
section repetitions
However, it has no special term for the symbol -- it simply describes
it in words: This sign (%) is used...
For the record, it also says Do not use [beat
I'm sure you remember the previous discussion we had on the same topic,
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-02/msg00624.html
Let's hope somebody else has some new bright idea.
/Mats
Palmer, Ralph wrote:
Greetings -
I'm working on Repeats for the GDP (yep, still).
2008/5/8 James E. Bailey:
in 2.11, the text is typeset between the bars. That is, the text fits
between the bars, and there's no need to white out part of the bar line to
accommodate the text.
That's right. However, the lyric hyphens sometimes do collide with bar
lines. Is there a way to
I see. Version 2.10 will do this too, if you uncomment the lines
\consists Separating_line_group_engraver
\override BarLine #'transparent = ##t
But it's not what I want: I'm specifically trying to get the masking-out
behaviour, without having to apply it syllable by syllable. (No
Try a ChoirStaff instead of a GrandStaff. I know I've never had your
problem with ChoirStaff, and unless you really, really need the bar
lines running between staves for some reason, things will work a lot
better.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
I would propose the following solution, which automatically adds the
white box around every syllable.
It works by redefining the function that typesets each LyricText object.
To make it work in version 2.10,
I copied (and slightly modified) a couple of functions that are
predefined in version
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
...
#(define (text-in-white-box grob)
(stencil-whiteout (ly:text-interface::print grob) 0.5))
This line should of course have been
(stencil-padded-whiteout (ly:text-interface::print grob) 0.5))
/Mats
___
lilypond-user
Thanks Mats. Exactly what I was after. One day I may even understand how
it works ;)
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
...
#(define (text-in-white-box grob)
(stencil-whiteout (ly:text-interface::print grob) 0.5))
This line should of course have been
(stencil-padded-whiteout
hi all
still no joy with this
for composition worksheets it would be great if i could, for example,
make all b-flats and c-sharps red, or have it so that only the notes
of the E-pentatonic scale have white-note-heads in a chromatically
embellished piece. i'd like to do this with
Greetings,
I don't know who added this snippet (Jay, is that you?), but there's
something obviously missing in the source code:
\relative c'' { c-+ }
dashPlus = trill
\relative c'' { c-+ }
I'll happily approve it... as soon as the code is fixed :)
Cheers,
Valentin
2008/5/8 Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't know who added this snippet (Jay, is that you?), but there's
something obviously missing in the source code:
Oh gosh, it's one of these 2.11 features again...
OK, never mind, I'll just add it to input/new. Sorry for the noise!
Cheers,
2008/5/8 Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Greetings,
I don't know who added this snippet (Jay, is that you?), but there's
something obviously missing in the source code:
\relative c'' { c-+ }
dashPlus = trill
\relative c'' { c-+ }
I'll happily approve it... as soon as the code is
2008/5/8 Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What's wrong with it? It works fine here.
Hmm... now it's not working; in fact, I can't get preview to work for
any snippet at the moment.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
2008/5/8 Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hmm... now it's not working; in fact, I can't get preview to work for
any snippet at the moment.
Neil, there are a few unapproved snippet that don't work with the LSR;
can you double-check them and add them to input/new whenever you think
it's
2008/5/8 Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Neil, there are a few unapproved snippet that don't work with the LSR;
can you double-check them and add them to input/new whenever you think
it's relevant (tag them as 'docs' as well, since Jay seems to need
them in the NR).
I assume Jay's
23 matches
Mail list logo