On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why should \new SomeThing be followed by { .. } ?
>
> I don't really understand what the error is (and it is not
> obvious to me that it lies in the input rather than in the
> parser), but there are several ways to work a
Hi Eric,
2008/7/15 Eric Knapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In this line:
>
>(sp (ly:grob-property grob 'staff-position))
>
> The staff position of the note is assigned to the variable sp. How
> could I get the fingering digit of the note? For example:
>
> c''-3
>
> I want to programmatically get t
Le 15 juil. 08 à 21:02, Trevor Daniels a écrit :
Roman Stawski wrote
<<
\new Staff { \new Voice = "dirge" { c''1 } }
\lyricsto "dirge" \new Lyrics { Whoops }
\tag #'harmony \new Staff { a'1 }
>>
OK, I see what you are trying to do. The error is that
the order of the commands in the lyrics li
Roman Stawski wrote
> The \tag command provokes a syntax error if it immediately follows a
> \lyricsto
> command. A work-around is to insert an empty expression {} between the
> two.
>
> \version "2.11.49"
> \paper{ ragged-right=##t }
> <<
> \new Voice = "dirge" { c''1 }
> \lyricsto "dirge" \
Eric Flesher gmail.com> writes:
>
> I am having an extremely difficult time finding an acceptable coding solution
> for a fairly straightforward (though relatively complex) notational problem:
... et cetera...
Here's the code:
\version "2.11.51"
upper = \relative c'' {
\clef bass
\tim
I am having an extremely difficult time finding an acceptable coding solution
for a fairly straightforward (though relatively complex) notational problem:
I have several measures of piano music (code appended below) in which an initial
chord is struck, with voices released at different times. This
Hi, all.
This is a working example that I got from the LSR. It is used with
\applyOutput:
#(define (mc-squared grob grob-origin context)
(let*
(
(ifs (ly:grob-interfaces grob))
(sp (ly:grob-property grob 'staff-position))
)
(if (memq 'note-head-interface ifs)
(begin
(ly:grob
on 2008-07-15 at 09:52 Palmer, Ralph wrote:
>Also, I hope the tenor of the discussion stays civil.
i'm sure we all wish the same.
>I'm on a PC running XP SP3 now, others are on Macs, and many seem to
>be running some version of Linux, so I would assume that not all
>software is useable by all o
Perhaps I should try again, but when I tried using JEdit about a year ago (with
LilyPondTool, I think - is JEdit normally used without LilyPondTool?), it took so long to
load JEdit, that I said, "Forget it - I'm going back to ConTEXT." ConTEXT is
not perfect, but it works and works quickly f
Hi -
I'd like to chime in with my two cents on the JEdit / no JEdit topic.
Perhaps I should try again, but when I tried using JEdit about a year ago (with
LilyPondTool, I think - is JEdit normally used without LilyPondTool?), it took
so long to load JEdit, that I said, "Forget it - I'm going b
on 2008-07-14 at 23:20 Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> Non-command-line people should be using jedit anyway
>
>No I shouldn't. I have a text editing environment that has all the
>features I need for editing all my text files, and I have no intention
>of learning to use another just so I can turn off po
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Bertalan Fodor wrote
Yes, it has a quite impressive list of highlighters, also syntax
checking for php and html via plugins
(http://jedit.org/index.php?page=features). I must note however, that
jedit's highlighter configuration is regular-expression based, so it
doesn'
Bertalan Fodor wrote
Yes, it has a quite impressive list of highlighters, also syntax
checking for php and html via plugins
(http://jedit.org/index.php?page=features). I must note however, that
jedit's highlighter configuration is regular-expression based, so it
doesn't have such power that
> > It's probably best to submit a bug report, together with a
> > high-resolution scan of such a note head. Werner
>
> Here it is:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p18178776/Rondes%2Bdouble%2Bbarr%25C3%25A9es.bmp
This is now registered as issue #648.
Werner
_
Currently JEdit with LilyPondTool is the only editor for LilyPond
that provides syntax checking and autocompletion of tweaks. I
consider those such crucial features I can't image how other people
can work without it. So it may worth learning to use another. That
will be the last, I'm sure. Th
Am Dienstag, 15. Juli 2008 schrieb Bertalan Fodor:
> Currently JEdit with LilyPondTool is the only editor for LilyPond that
> provides syntax checking and autocompletion of tweaks. I consider those
> such crucial features I can't image how other people can work without
> it.
Apparently, you haven
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Dienstag, 15. Juli 2008 schrieb Bertalan Fodor:
Currently JEdit with LilyPondTool is the only editor for LilyPond that
provides syntax checking and autocompletion of tweaks. I consider those
such crucial features I can't image how other people can work without
it.
Bertalan Fodor wrote
This argument is like: "I have all the predefined commands I need for
editing all my LilyPond files".
Not really. Using a *single* editor with which
I am very familiar and which has macros, easily
editable highlighers for most languages automatically
selected by file exte
18 matches
Mail list logo
