On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 05:12 +, Kevin Sapp wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been having trouble making lilypond due to a very strange error. The
> make
> claims that a file in $[LILYPOND]/flower, called file-name.cc, has some
> undeclared variables (specifically: PATH_MAX and cwd in the function 'string
>
Hi,
I've been having trouble making lilypond due to a very strange error. The make
claims that a file in $[LILYPOND]/flower, called file-name.cc, has some
undeclared variables (specifically: PATH_MAX and cwd in the function 'string
get_working_directory'). I would dig into this and just declare t
Hello, list! I has been a long time since I posted to this list and since I
actually coded with Lilypond. But I read the mailing list almost every day :)
I like to typeset songs using this typesetting style for lyrics: syllables are
left aligned when they are the beginning of a new verse of a po
That *is* a real beauty now - thanks a lot!
i must confess that i never believed i would - by throwing in a vague idea -
get such a fast solution!
Gilles THIBAULT wrote:
>
> NB
> If we go on with this discussion i think we have to open a new topic
> because we are far from the original one ...
notes = { a2-"hello" b4 r b2 a-"bye" < c e g c'>1-"oho" }
{ \displayLilyMusic \skipMusic \notes }
results in
{ s2-"hello" s4 s s2 s-"bye" s s s s -"oho" }
note the 4 "s" where it should be s1!
You 're right.
So it's a bit longer that i thought :
%%%
sk
Am 2008-08-22 um 14:22 schrieb Dmytro O. Redchuk:
2008/8/22 Ralph Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
By the way, Dmytro and fiëé visuëlle, check the docs for 2.11 (the
GDP) 1.4.1 Long repeats > manual repeat marks. Look for "multiple
repeat commands", and you'll find a simple example that fits the
pri
2008/8/22 Stefan Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm searching for a live Cd with lilypond. I know, there is Musix, but it
> has a very old version. And UBUNTU Studio, as far as I know, is not a live
> CD, or is it?
I'm afraid the best way is to build it yourself...
I built a Lilypond live-CD in J
Hi,
I'm searching for a live Cd with lilypond. I know, there is Musix, but it
has a very old version. And UBUNTU Studio, as far as I know, is not a live
CD, or is it?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listin
Trevor Daniels wrote Thursday, August 21, 2008 9:46 PM
Andrew Hawryluk wrote Thursday, August 21, 2008 2:10 AM
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Valentin Villenave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/8/12 Martin Klejch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
%% the "Lyrics independent of notes" example (chapter 7
Johan Vromans wrote:
I have a small tool (yes, me too) that transforms a section of notes
from absolute into relative.
Well, I worked for nothing then :)
could you share the code for the absolute to relative stuff, quick quick
quick :)
thank yo
Yota
___
[Quoting Gilles THIBAULT, on August 22 2008, 18:11, in "Re: Using one identi"]
> Sorry i don't really understand this parser behaviour but i only
> know i have to care with it ...
Ah, that's something I understand...
The parser compiles the first expression:
aNotes = \relative c' { c1 e g }
N
Sure, I'd like to try it :)
Jonathan
Johan Vromans wrote:
Eluze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Talking about utilities: Has anybody ever seen one that transforms a simple
voice (pitches and durations) into a "ghost voice" consisting of spacers and
durations only (e.g. c2 d e ==> s2 s s). This i
Eluze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Talking about utilities: Has anybody ever seen one that transforms a simple
> voice (pitches and durations) into a "ghost voice" consisting of spacers and
> durations only (e.g. c2 d e ==> s2 s s). This is very useful for writing
> simultaneous voice parts wher
Gilles THIBAULT wrote:
>
>
> In scheme, it can be quite short :
>
>
Maybe I wasn't to clear in my formulation - you're a step ahead.
I need a voice with spacers only (+durations) which I can edit and to which
I attach the different attributes.
I tried to use your nice little function with
Am 22.08.2008 um 19:21 schrieb Gilles THIBAULT:
Talking about utilities: Has anybody ever seen one that transforms
a simple
voice (pitches and durations) into a "ghost voice" consisting of
spacers and
durations only (e.g. c2 d e ==> s2 s s).
In scheme, it can be quite short :
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>
>
> What about putting it in a custom context which doesn't have a note
> engraver?
>
> Hope this helps!
>
Not really - I have no idea what you mean with a custom context: is that in
Lilypond or somewhere else?
I thought of using a find and replace action in a com
Talking about utilities: Has anybody ever seen one that transforms a
simple
voice (pitches and durations) into a "ghost voice" consisting of
spacers and
durations only (e.g. c2 d e ==> s2 s s).
In scheme, it can be quite short :
%%%
skipMusic = #(define-
Hi Eluze,
Talking about utilities: Has anybody ever seen one that transforms
a simple
voice (pitches and durations) into a "ghost voice" consisting of
spacers and
durations only (e.g. c2 d e ==> s2 s s).
What about putting it in a custom context which doesn't have a note
engraver?
(I'm
Neil Thornock wrote:
>
> The more utilities the better - we'll keep our
> bases covered.
>
Absolutely!
Talking about utilities: Has anybody ever seen one that transforms a simple
voice (pitches and durations) into a "ghost voice" consisting of spacers and
durations only (e.g. c2 d e ==> s2 s
aNotes = \relative c' { c1 e g }
#(define dummy #f)
#(if (not (defined? 'bNotes))
(define bNotes aNotes))
\score {
\bNotes
}
When the 'define dummy' is removed, it doesn't work anymore.
The doc say it is due to "parser lookahead" :
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/
> Anyway - what is the benefit of transforming absolute to relative pitches?
>
I work much better with relative - it is much faster to input the notes and
easier for me to see the line contour. At this point I rarely make
octavation errors (although only after 18 months of countless mistakes!),
b
Am 22.08.2008, 16:46 Uhr, schrieb Steve Dunlop
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I shall eagerly await the development of a script that will work in the
reverse direction.
Using \displayLilyMusic should give you the wanted absolute transformation!
(while writing this answer, I just saw Mats repsonse)
I
You're lucky today. Just read at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Displaying-LilyPond-notation#Displaying-LilyPond-notation
on how to use the function \displayLilyMusic. The manual doesn't point
out the fact that
it gives you absolute notation, but indeed it does.
/M
I shall eagerly await the development of a script that will work in the
reverse direction. When I edit scores prepared by others (often in
relative mode) from the Mutopia Project, I often make changes that
disturb the octavation, and it's time consuming to go back and fix.
Typically this happens
Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dan Eble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> aNotes = \relative c' { ... }
>
> %%From template:
> \score {
> #(if (not (defined? bNotes))
> (define bNotes aNotes))
> \bNotes
> }
>
> The intention is clear, but LilyPond/Scheme refu
Ok I tried it after changing italiano to nederlands in the python script
(btw, you also have to change it on line 85 of lilymusic.py), and I
removed the head, layout, and paper blocks. This all helps considerably.
Remaining problems:
1. did not handle \clef indication--it changed "bass" to "b
Jonathan > thank you for the remarks and for the samples too.
Neil > I corrected this small bug, indeed the script didn't care of the
options you fed it with. And if you prefer nederlands default output,
just change in lilymusic.py line 38
lily_out_style = "italiano"
into
lily_out_style = "ned
NR, 6.1.1 : probably, replace every "arg" with "var" (or otherwise):
--
6.1.1 Overview of music functions
Making a function which substitutes a variable into LilyPond code is
easy. The general form of these functions is
function =
#
Jonathan Kulp gmail.com> writes:
>
Here's the
> format I tried:
>
> cat file.ly | python lilymusic.py --out_style="nederlands" > file-new.ly
>
Here's a slightly easier (IMO) method of invoking this routine:
python lilymusic.py --out_style="nederlands" < file.ly > file-new.ly
Instead of usi
2008/8/22 Ralph Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> By the way, Dmytro and fiëé visuëlle, check the docs for 2.11 (the
> GDP) 1.4.1 Long repeats > manual repeat marks. Look for "multiple
> repeat commands", and you'll find a simple example that fits the
> printed output:
Yes, but in initial post there wa
Hi,
I just compiled a piece of music that I created earlier this summer
and I noticed that if I modify the minimum-Y-extent the lyric text
sometimes moves the following notes. I wonder if this is a deliberate
change or a bug?
The behaviour changed between 2.11.52 and 2.11.53.
I have attached two
By the way, Dmytro and fiëé visuëlle, check the docs for 2.11 (the
GDP) 1.4.1 Long repeats > manual repeat marks. Look for "multiple
repeat commands", and you'll find a simple example that fits the
printed output:
f4 g a b
\set Score.repeatCommands = #'((volta "2, 5") end-repeat)
g4 a g a
c1
\set
32 matches
Mail list logo
