Back then I created a cartoonish music-note character as a joke:
http://valentin.villenave.info/lilypond/sketchbook/lilypond.png
I still use it every now and then on the unofficial LilyPond community
website, lilynet.net .
I like it very much. It would be nice to have it as a wallpaper!
Thanks for the comments.
I am using the editor TeXShop with MacOSX, and so I cannot enter
French characters via the editor.
I did not find 3.3.3 of the reference manual useful. How/where does
one find the hex code for e' for instance? Googling
ISO/IEC did not shed any light on how to
I am using the editor TeXShop with MacOSX, and so I cannot enter French
characters via the editor.
I did not find 3.3.3 of the reference manual useful. How/where does one
find the hex code for e' for instance? Googling
ISO/IEC did not shed any light on how to find the actual codes.
Thank you all for your solutions!
I prefer the fiddling with voiceOne and voiceTwo etc. (see below) because it
ties the notes not only visually (as opposed to invisible extra notes in one
voice). The midi-version sounds right, too. I think this is a case for the
snippet repository.
All the
Hi Graham,
I am using the editor TeXShop with MacOSX, and so I cannot enter
French characters via the editor.
Yes, you can! It's not difficult. Go to TeXShop/Preferences, choose encoding:
Unicode (UTF-8) and click ok. Then you can enter any accent you want.
Cheers,
Patrick
Hi Graham,
it's much easier than you think. If you want to enter for example an é, just
type »´e« or whatever character you want. Some characters (like umlauts) may
not be directly accessible via a certain key but there are always shortcuts for
characters. Maybe you should install the software
Thanks, but the first two lines of your attachment came through as
e cute: 'squareroot sign' 'copywrite sign'
e grave: 'squareroot sign' 'copywrite sign'
which I cannot use. There seems to be a transmission error here but
You still must enable UTF-8 mode in your editor.
Frédéric
Hi all,
I have been working on the score, I have been using the documentation
cited below, and all is working just fine. I was just questioning if
anyone has experience in working with large measures and looking for a
good prototype of how to approach the issue. More of a typesetting
question
If you need one more publisher to fill the empty space in the production
page, you could add my http://theshadylanepublishing.com website , it is
very very small so I don't know if it will be fine.
Matthieu
-
http://theshadylanepublishing.com/ The Shady Lane Publishing
--
View this
Hm, strange that you can't use the Special Characters. I can't think of any
reason why it shouldn't work. I can use it without any problems.
Anyway: Are you sure that the encoding is UTF-8? Close TeXShop, open it again
and check Preferences. In the case of »é« I think you are using the wrong
Hello,
What's this score featuring? I'd like to know some about it. Could anyone
please give me a simple visual description?
Regards
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Haipeng
This score is a joke. It's an impossibly complex score with all
sorts of ridiculous constructs and amusing articulations. For
example,the header says Words and music by John Stump, arranged by
Accident and there are textual instructions like Adagio cantabile
with a rock tempo feel
Hi all,
I would like to achieve a chord slide. Here's my code (based on the Double
Glissando snippet):
\version 2.13.3
\relative c'{
e,16 e
{
% new voice ( = \voiceOne), hidden
\hideNotes
% attach glissando to note heads
e'\glissando f
}
\\
{
%
Dear All,
The Unicodes are available from TeXShop Edit Special Characters
(in MaC OS).
Just select a character and let the mouse hover over it. (A total of
2820 glyphs can be obtained this way.)
Here is a table of special French characters obtained in this way:
character
craigbakalian wrote:
I have been working on the score, I have been using the
documentation cited below, and all is working just fine. I was
just questioning if anyone has experience in working with large
measures and looking for a good prototype of how to approach the
issue. More of a
There is a problem, however -- a
slight extra space appears where the invisible fake-barlines
(possible break-points) are. And the obvious way of correcting
that didn't work. I'll ask the other developers if there's a way
to fix that.
I've reported this already:
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
There is a problem, however -- a
slight extra space appears where the invisible fake-barlines
(possible break-points) are. And the obvious way of correcting
that didn't work. I'll ask the other developers if there's a way
to fix that.
I've reported this
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 10:39 -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
There is a problem, however -- a
slight extra space appears where the invisible fake-barlines
(possible break-points) are. And the obvious way of correcting
that didn't work. I'll ask the other developers
Joe Neeman wrote:
The semantically valid solution (IMO) is ignore the \bar in
the spacing problem and insert only one spring (between the
notes). Fortunately, we have a mechanism for that already
(called loose columns). It's just a matter of tweaking the
inclusion test for this mechanism to
Mark Polesky wrote:
that's one bug I'd be happy to see fixed!
Well, for the time being, here's a slightly improved compromise.
- Mark
\version 2.13.3
\layout {
% line-width is set just to demonstrate the function.
line-width = #50
}
softBreak = {
\once \override Staff.BarLine
Graham Norton wrote Sunday, August 02, 2009 2:06 PM
PS I think it would be useful if the doc in Notation Reference
3.3.3 said something about how to obtain the unicodes (for users
who are not using a UTF-8 supported edito)r.
Done. I've added a uref to the Unicode Consortium
at
Patrick Schmidt wrote Sunday, August 02, 2009 1:50 PM
I would like to achieve a chord slide.
1) How come that I can see the glissando marks when I use half
notes but not when I use sixteenths?
The glissando can often become so short it
is invisible, as happens here. It's length
can be
Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I think a note about arrowed arpeggios that cross staves would
be helpful under the Arpeggios-Known issues and warnings
subheading in NR 1.3.3. There's such a note about cross-staff
tremolos being tricky, which saved me from trying a bunch of
unnecessary tweaks to get
My main frustration with Lilypond is speed. In my setup (Win-XP, P4 3.0Ghz, 1G
ram) to process a fairly simple scoresheet (2 or 3 pages) it takes about 8
seconds. That might not seem a great deal, but it is really annoying when one is
doing lots of retouching (edit one bit, compile, see results,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 12:19:28AM +, hernan wrote:
Is there some recipe to speed things up? Are the performance bottlenecks
identified?
There are some minor tweaks you can do. I think they're currently
listed in LM 5. Speeding up typesetting or something like that.
I read in the
--- On Mon, 8/3/09, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: \arpeggioArrowUp across staves
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com, Mats Bengtsson
mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se, lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org
Date: Monday, August 3,
Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I guess I would have expected \arpeggioArrowUp to affect all the
following arpeggios, regardless of whether they are connected or not.
What do you think?
Ah, I put a context where I meant to put a parent. This is why
I need someone to test this stuff. You can fix it
27 matches
Mail list logo
